AIRLINK 62.48 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (3.39%)
BOP 5.36 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
CNERGY 4.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.43%)
DFML 15.50 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (4.45%)
DGKC 66.40 Increased By ▲ 1.60 (2.47%)
FCCL 17.59 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (4.33%)
FFBL 27.70 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (11.92%)
FFL 9.27 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.32%)
GGL 10.06 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1%)
HBL 105.70 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (1.43%)
HUBC 122.30 Increased By ▲ 4.78 (4.07%)
HUMNL 6.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.92%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.1%)
KOSM 4.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.97%)
MLCF 36.20 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (2.23%)
OGDC 122.92 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (0.43%)
PAEL 23.00 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.97%)
PIAA 29.34 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (7.51%)
PIBTL 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.36%)
PPL 107.50 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.12%)
PRL 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (2.79%)
PTC 18.07 Increased By ▲ 1.97 (12.24%)
SEARL 53.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.17%)
SNGP 63.21 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (3.28%)
SSGC 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.47%)
TELE 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (8.36%)
TPLP 11.44 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (8.13%)
TRG 70.86 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.36%)
UNITY 23.62 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.47%)
WTL 1.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 6,944 Increased By 65.8 (0.96%)
BR30 22,827 Increased By 258.6 (1.15%)
KSE100 67,142 Increased By 594.3 (0.89%)
KSE30 22,090 Increased By 175.1 (0.8%)
Pakistan

Senate polls reference hearing: Vote cannot be secret forever, SC tells ECP

  • Justice Ahsan says a political party should have seats in the Senate according to their existing seats in the provincial assemblies
  • Term open voting is used in terms of the National Assembly elections, but the law doesn't say the same for Senate's polls: SC
Published February 17, 2021

(Karachi) Hearing a case related to the presidential reference for open voting in the upper House of the parliament, Supreme Court of Pakistan observed that a vote in Senate polls cannot remain secret forever. It stated that a political party should only get seats in Senate in accordance with its representation in provincial assemblies.

These observations were made by a five-member Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed on Wednesday.

During the hearing on Tuesday, the Supreme Court bench had asked Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikander Sultan Raja to consider recommendations presented by Attorney General of Pakistan Khalid Jawed Khan and submit a response to the court.

In its response submitted to the court today, the ECP maintained that according to Article 226 of the Constitution, Senate elections could be held through secret voting only.

The ECP counsel told the top court that the meaning of secret voting is that the votes will remain secret. He added that the votes casted cannot be revealed to anyone ever.

At this, Justice Ijaz said that a vote cannot remain concealed forever. "To keep the votes secret forever is not as per the Constitution, neither it is [conveyed] in the court's previous decisions."

He asked the counsel as to what "proportionate representation" actually meant. He noted that the term open voting is used in terms of the National Assembly elections, but the law doesn't say the same for Senate's polls.

The judge asked how would the electoral authority ensure proportionate representation of political parties in the voting.

"The ECP will be responsible if a party receives lesser number of votes," Justice Ijaz said, adding that, "it will be ECP's failure if a party doesn't win seats as proportionate to their representation in the national provincial assemblies."

"The selling of votes would destroy the concept of proportionate representation [of Senate's seats]," he maintained.

Justice Mushir Alam observed that the matter of secrecy is part of the Elections Act 2017 but the question is to what extent would secrecy be applicable.

The ECP lawyer argued that if "free votes were not given, it would not be an election but a selection".

Justice Alam replied that the secrecy of the vote ended after it was cast. "The ECP can analyse the casted votes in order to end corruption."

Chief Justice Ahmed questioned what steps the ECP would take if a party got more seats in the Senate compared to its representation in the provincial assemblies. He also questioned whether the Senate elections would be illegal if proportional representation was not achieved.

After hearing the arguments, the court adjourned the hearing of the case till tomorrow (Thursday).

Comments

Comments are closed.