AIRLINK 74.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-0.75%)
BOP 5.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.79%)
CNERGY 4.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.45%)
DFML 41.75 Increased By ▲ 2.02 (5.08%)
DGKC 86.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.55 (-1.77%)
FCCL 21.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.19%)
FFBL 34.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-1.42%)
FFL 9.97 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.26%)
GGL 10.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
HBL 113.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.12%)
HUBC 136.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.31%)
HUMNL 11.90 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (9.17%)
KEL 4.84 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.64%)
KOSM 4.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.22%)
MLCF 38.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.52%)
OGDC 135.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-0.4%)
PAEL 26.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.49%)
PIAA 20.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.69 (-7.51%)
PIBTL 6.70 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.45%)
PPL 122.50 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.17%)
PRL 26.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.93%)
PTC 14.53 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (4.46%)
SEARL 59.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-1.45%)
SNGP 69.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.56%)
SSGC 10.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.59%)
TPLP 11.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.23%)
TRG 65.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.70 (-1.06%)
UNITY 26.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.84%)
WTL 1.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.74%)
BR100 7,846 Increased By 22.2 (0.28%)
BR30 25,356 Decreased By -49.4 (-0.19%)
KSE100 75,117 Increased By 33.2 (0.04%)
KSE30 24,118 Increased By 24.8 (0.1%)

imageISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notices to respondents in an appeal against the Peshawar High Court's suo-moto notice regarding barring women from casting votes during the by-elections in NA-5, Nowshera.

The case was heard by a two-judge bench comprising Justice Khilji Arif Hussain and Justice Ejaz Ahmed Chaudhry.

During the course of proceeding, Athar Minallah, counsel for the appellant argued that the Peshawar High Court took suo-moto over a complaint that women were not allowed to take part in the by-elections in NA-5.

He continued that under the Article 184(3) and 199, high court does not have jurisdiction to take suo-moto on the issue.

Minallah maintained that if an aggrieved or complainant would have filed a petition regarding the barring of women from casting votes then the court might take notice on the issue.

He argued that no one was aggrieved in the constituency then the high court should not have stopped the whole election process and the results should be announced.

Giving example of NA-32, he stated that elections were not barred in NA-32 Upper Dir where only one woman casted vote even then no suo-moto was taken then why it was taken in NA-5.

The bench issued notices to the respondents and adjourned further hearing till September 10.

Comments

Comments are closed.