AIRLINK 73.18 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.52%)
BOP 5.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.19%)
CNERGY 4.37 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.92%)
DFML 29.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.87%)
DGKC 91.39 Increased By ▲ 5.44 (6.33%)
FCCL 23.15 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (3.58%)
FFBL 33.50 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.84%)
FFL 9.92 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.43%)
GGL 10.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.48%)
HBL 113.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.61 (-0.54%)
HUBC 136.28 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.06%)
HUMNL 9.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-4.29%)
KEL 4.78 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.58%)
KOSM 4.72 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (7.27%)
MLCF 39.89 Increased By ▲ 1.54 (4.02%)
OGDC 133.90 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.37%)
PAEL 28.85 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (5.29%)
PIAA 25.00 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.97%)
PIBTL 6.94 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (5.95%)
PPL 122.40 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (0.98%)
PRL 27.40 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.92%)
PTC 14.80 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (6.55%)
SEARL 60.40 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SNGP 70.29 Increased By ▲ 1.76 (2.57%)
SSGC 10.42 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.87%)
TELE 8.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-2.21%)
TPLP 11.32 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.53%)
TRG 66.57 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.32%)
UNITY 25.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.2%)
WTL 1.55 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (3.33%)
BR100 7,674 Increased By 40.1 (0.53%)
BR30 25,457 Increased By 285.1 (1.13%)
KSE100 73,086 Increased By 427.5 (0.59%)
KSE30 23,427 Increased By 44.5 (0.19%)
Top News

PBC urges SC to declare contempt law null, void

KHUDAYAR MOHLA ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) on Monday urged the court to declare the new contempt of court l
Published July 31, 2012

supreme-court-of-pakistanKHUDAYAR MOHLA

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) on Monday urged the court to declare the new contempt of court law null and void. 

A five-judge bench comprising Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, Justice Shakirullah Jan, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, Justice Jawad S Khawaja and Justice Tassadduq Hussain Jilani, was hearing as many as 27 identical petitions against Contempt of Court Act, 2012.

All the petitioners finalised their arguments. Federation’s counsel Shakoor Piracha sought two days’ time, but the bench directed him to deliver arguments on Tuesday (today).

Dispelling the impression that the debate over the legislative process of new contempt of court law was inappropriate, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry clarified that both the treasury and the opposition benches had done their job well.

However, the CJP added the ongoing debate over the law ought to be taken ‘positively’ which would strengthen the democratic system in the country. According to him, it is a normal practice in Europe and the US.

“The apex lawyers’ body [PBC] in the country has submitted an imperative pray to declare the new contempt of court law null and void but it must be understood that democratic process would not weaken due to the matter in hand,” the Chief Justice remarked.

The counsel for PBC, Latif Afridi, submitted that there was no confrontation between Parliament and Supreme Court. He urged the court to declare the new contempt of court law null and void because “it is violative of the Constitution of Pakistan.”

One of the petitioners, Shahid Orakzai, contended that the new contempt law would have to be read in conjunction with the constitution, adding that the law had endangered the constitution instead of enhancing respect for the courts.

Orakzai said that word ‘ridicule’ had been excluded from the new contempt of court law saying that when a person became a judge, he must be respected. He further contended that the constitution did not grant immunity to anyone. The Chief Justice Iftikhar remarked that if the court decides against a party, that party later became judiciary’s enemy.

Former Justice Nasira Iqbal, representing a petitioner, said that new contempt of court law was ultra vires “Act 204 (2) of the Constitution,” adding that the timing of the enactment and haste in which the new law was passed “smacks of mala fide.”

Mehmood Bhatti, a counsel for another petitioner, pleaded that there should not be intra-court appeal for a show cause notice in the new contempt of court law, saying that the object of the appeal was to prolong the litigation process.

The court adjourned hearing of the case till July 31.

Comments

Comments are closed.