BR100 Decreased By (-0.2%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.13%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.1%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.09%)
BECO 5.71 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.53%)
BML 64.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.06%)
BOP 34.00 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.19%)
CNERGY 8.24 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 11.49 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.23%)
FCCL 52.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.4%)
FCSC 5.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.72%)
FFL 17.84 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.22%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.26 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.18%)
KEL 7.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.88%)
KOSM 5.51 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.29%)
MLCF 86.30 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.34%)
NBP 185.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PACE 11.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.16%)
PAEL 40.69 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.19%)
PIAHCLA 26.00 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.05%)
PIBTL 17.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.52%)
PPL 224.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.22%)
PRL 34.50 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.35%)
PTC 65.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.14%)
SEARL 90.63 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.13%)
SSGC 26.95 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.71%)
TELE 9.30 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.79%)
THCCL 68.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.08%)
TPLP 11.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-2.74%)
TREET 24.85 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.22%)
TRG 71.79 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.17%)
WAVES 11.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.18%)
WTL 1.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR Research Print edition: 2025-09-19

An anti-farmer government?

Published September 19, 2025 Updated September 19, 2025 09:05am

Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) has reportedly floated another tender to import 0.1 million tons of sugar, on top of an earlier 0.1 million tons this month. On the face of it, the timing seems perfect.

World sugar prices are at a 50-month low, down nearly a quarter from domestic retail. For a government under pressure due to fears of looming food inflation, importing at these levels should have been a straightforward win: cheap supply to calm the market.

Except that is not what has happened. News reports suggest Pakistan has contracted its first consignment at an average of $565 per ton, almost 20 percent higher than the prevailing international average of $470. Even if one accounts for the fact that contracts are booked on a C&F basis, the math does not flatter.

At these rates, the landed cost is only about 13 percent lower than current retail. Once taxes, inland transport, warehousing, and financing are factored in, the price difference between imported sugar and domestic market rates virtually disappears.

This raises a basic question: if imports are not meaningfully cheaper, why now? The official answer is to relieve pressure on supply, with fresh crushing still two months away. But the timing betrays another effect.

By releasing imported stock right on the cusp of harvest, the state has stripped cane growers of the one bargaining chip they enjoy each year.

Ordinarily, a seasonal tightness before crushing allows farmers to negotiate better prices with mills. Now, that window is gone. Farmers already reeling from the impact of flooding on their crop will see their returns clipped even further.

Consumers, meanwhile, will not see much lasting benefit either. Any short-term dip in prices will be erased as soon as the imported stock is consumed.

Once the peak harvest glut is over, retail prices will resume their familiar upward climb during off-production months, egged on by lower cane output due to post-flood yield losses. The only guaranteed outcome is that TCP will book losses and the deficit will quietly absorb them next year.

So, the real beneficiaries of this import spree are neither farmers nor consumers. The sugar industry benefits from higher prices that will almost certainly bounce back by next March, the government buys a few headlines about temporarily “taming sugar” and ordinary Pakistanis are left with the same price cycle and a bigger fiscal hole. That is not reform, not stabilization, not even crisis management. It is simply anti-farmer policy dressed up as consumer relief.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Taha Sep 19, 2025 03:49pm
JazakAllah for raising this issue
0