BR100 Increased By (1.5%)
BR30 Increased By (1.74%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.63%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.58%)
BECO 5.73 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.35%)
BML 58.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-1.16%)
BOP 36.41 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (1.9%)
CNERGY 8.37 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.09%)
DCL 11.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.15%)
FCCL 57.40 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.02%)
FCSC 5.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.63%)
FFL 18.10 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.39%)
FNEL 1.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.74 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.69%)
KEL 8.21 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.73%)
KOSM 6.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.32%)
MLCF 98.75 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (0.63%)
NBP 206.02 Increased By ▲ 7.69 (3.88%)
PACE 11.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.51%)
PAEL 43.69 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (1.39%)
PIAHCLA 27.93 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (2.12%)
PIBTL 17.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.33%)
PPL 235.79 Increased By ▲ 3.01 (1.29%)
PRL 36.30 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.71%)
PTC 69.10 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (2.25%)
SEARL 96.18 Increased By ▲ 1.90 (2.02%)
SSGC 30.13 Increased By ▲ 2.47 (8.93%)
TELE 9.24 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.54%)
THCCL 70.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-0.74%)
TPLP 11.55 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.58%)
TREET 25.56 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.55%)
TRG 69.35 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.73%)
WAVES 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.22%)
WTL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
By

NEW DELHI: India’s IT ministry has unlawfully expanded censorship powers to allow the easier removal of online content and empowered “countless” government officials to execute such orders, Elon Musk’s X has alleged in a new lawsuit against New Delhi.

The lawsuit and the allegations mark an escalation in an ongoing legal dispute between X and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government over how New Delhi orders content to be taken down. It also comes as Musk is getting closer to launching his other key ventures Starlink and Tesla in India.

In the new court filing dated March 5, X argues India’s IT Ministry is asking other departments to use a government website launched by the Ministry of Home Affairs last year to issue content blocking orders and mandate social media companies to join the website too.

This mechanism, X says, does not contain the stringent Indian legal safeguards on content removal that required such orders to be issued in cases such as harm to sovereignty or public order, and came with strict oversight of top officials.

India’s IT ministry redirected a Reuters’ request for comment to the home affairs ministry, which did not respond.

The website creates “an impermissible parallel mechanism” that causes “unrestrained censorship of information in India”, X said, adding it is seeking to quash the directive.

Musk blames X outage on cyberattack

X’s court papers are not public and were reported for the first time by media on Thursday.

The case was briefly heard earlier this week by a judge in the High Court of southern Karnataka state but no final decision was reached. It will now be heard on March 27.

In 2021, X, formerly called Twitter, was locked in a stand-off with the Indian government over non-compliance of legal orders to block certain tweets related to a farmers’ protest against government policies.

X later complied following public criticism by officials, but its legal challenge to the decision is continuing in Indian courts.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.