AIRLINK 160.00 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.03%)
BOP 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.4%)
CNERGY 7.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.78%)
CPHL 87.50 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.06%)
FCCL 48.24 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.63%)
FFL 15.32 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.99%)
FLYNG 50.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.32%)
HUBC 141.46 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.52%)
HUMNL 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.26%)
KEL 4.41 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
KOSM 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.39%)
MLCF 75.06 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.37%)
OGDC 213.14 Increased By ▲ 1.64 (0.78%)
PACE 5.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-3.17%)
PAEL 45.68 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.75%)
PIAHCLA 16.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
PIBTL 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.69%)
POWER 14.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 174.98 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (1.5%)
PRL 33.70 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.81%)
PTC 22.85 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.57%)
SEARL 87.25 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.03%)
SSGC 36.11 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (1.18%)
SYM 15.40 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.79%)
TELE 7.55 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.21%)
TPLP 8.95 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
TRG 63.74 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
WAVESAPP 9.18 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.44%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.70 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.93%)
BR100 12,827 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 37,833 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 120,181 Increased By 532 (0.44%)
KSE30 36,753 Increased By 151.5 (0.41%)

NEW DELHI: India’s IT ministry has unlawfully expanded censorship powers to allow the easier removal of online content and empowered “countless” government officials to execute such orders, Elon Musk’s X has alleged in a new lawsuit against New Delhi.

The lawsuit and the allegations mark an escalation in an ongoing legal dispute between X and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government over how New Delhi orders content to be taken down. It also comes as Musk is getting closer to launching his other key ventures Starlink and Tesla in India.

In the new court filing dated March 5, X argues India’s IT Ministry is asking other departments to use a government website launched by the Ministry of Home Affairs last year to issue content blocking orders and mandate social media companies to join the website too.

This mechanism, X says, does not contain the stringent Indian legal safeguards on content removal that required such orders to be issued in cases such as harm to sovereignty or public order, and came with strict oversight of top officials.

India’s IT ministry redirected a Reuters’ request for comment to the home affairs ministry, which did not respond.

The website creates “an impermissible parallel mechanism” that causes “unrestrained censorship of information in India”, X said, adding it is seeking to quash the directive.

Musk blames X outage on cyberattack

X’s court papers are not public and were reported for the first time by media on Thursday.

The case was briefly heard earlier this week by a judge in the High Court of southern Karnataka state but no final decision was reached. It will now be heard on March 27.

In 2021, X, formerly called Twitter, was locked in a stand-off with the Indian government over non-compliance of legal orders to block certain tweets related to a farmers’ protest against government policies.

X later complied following public criticism by officials, but its legal challenge to the decision is continuing in Indian courts.

Comments

200 characters