AIRLINK 74.65 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.48%)
BOP 4.97 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.4%)
CNERGY 4.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.23%)
DFML 41.10 Increased By ▲ 2.30 (5.93%)
DGKC 85.80 Increased By ▲ 0.98 (1.16%)
FCCL 21.34 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.61%)
FFBL 34.25 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.38%)
FFL 9.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
GGL 10.43 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
HBL 113.80 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.71%)
HUBC 137.31 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (0.81%)
HUMNL 11.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.1%)
KEL 4.84 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.76%)
KOSM 4.67 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (5.18%)
MLCF 37.81 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.42%)
OGDC 139.65 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (2.53%)
PAEL 25.49 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (1.55%)
PIAA 20.68 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (7.48%)
PIBTL 6.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.04%)
PPL 122.69 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (0.48%)
PRL 26.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
PTC 13.96 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.22%)
SEARL 58.10 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.54%)
SNGP 67.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.67%)
SSGC 10.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.49%)
TELE 8.44 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.48%)
TPLP 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.27%)
TRG 64.45 Increased By ▲ 1.64 (2.61%)
UNITY 26.58 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.3%)
WTL 1.43 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.93%)
BR100 7,838 Increased By 27.4 (0.35%)
BR30 25,392 Increased By 241.7 (0.96%)
KSE100 75,065 Increased By 108.4 (0.14%)
KSE30 24,131 Increased By 47.7 (0.2%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court Monday rejected a review petition filed by former lower court employee Ahtisham-ul-Haq seeking restoration of job. Ahtisham-ul-Haq was working in Civil Court Kharian as Record Keeper and Services Tribunal terminated his employment over leakage of state documents.

The Supreme Court also maintained the Services Tribunal ordered. Later, the petitioner filed a review petition in the Supreme Court against its orders.

A three-member bench of the  court headed by Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa and comprising Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Umar Ata Bandial dismissed the review appeal and remarked that it was not a matter of basic rights so the court had already rejected an appeal in this regard.

During the course of proceedings, the Chief Justice observed that the petitioner had also changed his counsel.

According to the law, the lawyer who will appear in the first case, the same lawyer will also appear in the review appeal so that no other lawyer could raise false hope for the petitioners in the review petitions, he added.

The counsel for the petitioner said that his client could not submit documents before the Sessions Judge due to strike.

The Chief Justice remarked that lawyers would be on strike not judges. The law makes its own way whenever such matters surfaces, he added. The court after hearing arguments dismissed the review petition and remarked that it was not a matter of basic rights.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.