South Africa's top court on Friday ruled that parliament had failed to hold President Jacob Zuma accountable for using public money for private home upgrades, a move that could lead to impeachment proceedings. Opposition parties had gone to the Constitutional Court to argue that the speaker of parliament failed to enforce the appropriate processes to censure Zuma over the scandal.
Zuma had failed to abide by recommendations made by the country's anti corruption watchdog in 2014 over refurbishments at his personal home in the eastern KwaZulu-Natal province that misused $15 million (12 million euros) of taxpayers' money.
The scandal came to a dramatic climax when the Constitutional Court last year found the president guilty of violating his oath of office by refusing to pay back the cash. "We conclude that (National) Assembly did not hold the president to account," said Constitutional Court judge Chris Jafta. "The failure by the National Assembly to make rules regulating removal of the president... constitutes a violation" of the constitution, the court said. It ordered that the National Assembly "must comply" with the constitution and make rules that could be used for the removal of the president "without delay".
Defeated in court and facing mounting public criticism, Zuma later relented and paid $500,000, a sum set by the treasury following last year's ruling. In power since 2009, Zuma stepped down last week as president of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) party after a 10 year term marked by numerous damning court judgements against him. Friday's ruling is expected to pile pressure on the beleaguered leader to resign ahead of the end of his term as state president in 2019. Zuma was succeeded by his deputy Cyril Ramaphosa in a tightly fought contest in which his former wife Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma also ran.
Comments
Comments are closed for this article.