BR100 Increased By (0.14%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.19%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.12%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.09%)
AGHA 7.79 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.52%)
BECO 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.77%)
BML 57.26 Decreased By ▼ -1.40 (-2.39%)
BOP 34.10 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (1.22%)
CNERGY 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-6.5%)
CSIL 5.35 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.94%)
FCCL 54.61 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.62%)
FFL 16.70 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (1.46%)
FNEL 1.24 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.64%)
KEL 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.92%)
KOSM 5.75 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.95%)
LOTCHEM 29.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.01%)
MLCF 94.35 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-2.09%)
NBP 202.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-0.41%)
NCPL 57.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.26%)
NPL 67.78 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.7%)
OGDC 316.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.57%)
PACE 10.64 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
PAEL 43.15 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (3.3%)
PIBTL 16.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
PPL 220.50 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (0.15%)
PRL 49.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 70.98 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.39%)
SSGC 28.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-3.33%)
TBL 9.90 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.33%)
TELE 8.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
TPL 18.14 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (5.65%)
TPLP 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (7.11%)
TREET 22.75 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.71%)
TRG 60.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.13%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High court has held that the tax levied by a cantonment board within its jurisdiction under Presidential Order No 13 (PO 13) of 1979 read with the Cantonments Act, 1924 is lawful and within its lawful competence.

The court passed this order in scores of petitions filed against vires of section 3 of the PO 13 of 1979 which empowered the cantonment boards to levy urban immovable property tax on the annual value of buildings and lands situated within its jurisdiction.

The court observed that the levy and collection of property tax by the cantonment boards under PO 13 of 1979 read with the Cantonments Act falls within protective constitutional framework ensuring fiscal continuity and no constitutional infirmity or illegality is discernible in the impugned actions, the court added.

The court declared that Section 3(1)(a) of the Cantonments (Urban Immovable Property Tax and Entertainments Duty) Order, 1979 is valid, constitutional and intra vires the Constitution.

The court also observed that PO 13 of 1979 operates in harmony with this statutory framework.

It neither creates an independent or alien levy nor introduces any unconstitutional exaction rather, it regulates and preserves the fiscal field within cantonment areas by excluding the operation of provincial property tax legislation and reaffirming the authority of cantonment boards under federal law, the court added.

The court remarked that the contention, PO 13 of 1979 stood impliedly repealed after the Eighteenth Amendment is legally untenable.

The court said, the PO 13 of 1979 continues to remain in force in the absence of any express repeal or amendment by the appropriate legislature in terms of Article 270-A(3) read with clause (6) thereof.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining