BR100 Increased By (1.02%)
BR30 Increased By (1.71%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.58%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.65%)
BECO 6.03 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (4.51%)
BML 52.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-0.74%)
BOP 34.23 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.71%)
CNERGY 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
DCL 12.23 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.25%)
FCCL 53.80 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.84%)
FCSC 5.24 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.35%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.45%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 11.00 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
KEL 8.07 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.36%)
MLCF 87.90 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (1.61%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (0.78%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.61%)
PAEL 39.95 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1.34%)
PIAHCLA 26.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PIBTL 17.32 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (3.9%)
PPL 233.49 Increased By ▲ 5.31 (2.33%)
PRL 34.98 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.87%)
PTC 67.71 Increased By ▲ 2.38 (3.64%)
SEARL 90.90 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.85%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (2.26%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.5%)
THCCL 60.85 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (4.02%)
TPLP 8.78 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (6.81%)
TREET 24.65 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.49%)
TRG 71.50 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (2.57%)
WAVES 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.7%)
WTL 1.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.78%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) Inland Revenue (Operations) Wing has failed to implement a lawful order of the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) in favour of a corporate entity, reflecting non-compliance and absence of accountability within the tax machinery.

Recently, according to the FTO’s recorded findings, the Corporate Tax Office (CTO), Islamabad deliberately failed to submit para-wise comments on the complainant’s allegations, despite a clear statutory obligation under section 10(4) of the FTO Ordinance, 2000, read with sections 9(1) & (2) of the Federal Ombudsmen Institutional Reforms Act (FOIRA), 2013.

This failure persisted even though the FBR had already issued explicit circulars directing all field formations to submit detailed para-wise replies in FTO proceedings.

Instead of complying with the law, the department adopted a casual and evasive approach, merely stating that the “refund application is under process,” without addressing a single allegation raised in the complaint. The FTO categorically held that such conduct reflects neglect, inattention, and a wilful disregard of statutory duties and binding instructions of the Board. Taking serious notice of this serious lapse the FTO formally referred the matter to the Member IR-Operations, FBR, advising him to personally examine the misconduct and initiate appropriate disciplinary action against the delinquent officers.

Waheed Shahzad Butt Advocate who is representing the complainant, has termed this episode as a disturbing signal for rule of law, noting that when tax authorities themselves defy oversight institutions, it undermines taxpayer confidence and weakens accountability mechanisms. He stresses that failure to file para-wise comments is not a technical lapse but a direct violation of law, designed to frustrate justice and delay relief to aggrieved citizens.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.