AIRLINK 74.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.07%)
BOP 5.11 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.19%)
CNERGY 4.43 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
DFML 37.69 Increased By ▲ 1.85 (5.16%)
DGKC 90.45 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (2.78%)
FCCL 22.60 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.8%)
FFBL 32.95 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.7%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.83 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.28%)
HBL 116.16 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.22%)
HUBC 135.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.25%)
HUMNL 9.88 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.41%)
KEL 4.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 4.80 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3%)
MLCF 40.53 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (1.63%)
OGDC 138.21 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.22%)
PAEL 26.60 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.64%)
PIAA 26.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.84%)
PIBTL 6.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.89%)
PPL 123.55 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.53%)
PRL 26.94 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.94%)
PTC 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.71%)
SEARL 59.28 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.99%)
SNGP 70.87 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.67%)
SSGC 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
TELE 8.64 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.93%)
TPLP 11.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.79%)
TRG 64.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.42%)
UNITY 26.10 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,862 Increased By 23.8 (0.3%)
BR30 25,562 Increased By 102.2 (0.4%)
KSE100 75,169 Increased By 238.4 (0.32%)
KSE30 24,193 Increased By 47.4 (0.2%)

NEW YORK: The U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) criticised the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) on Wednesday for “doubling down on half-truths”, after the global body published a document outlining its handling of a case involving Chinese swimmers.

WADA has been under fire since the New York Times reported, opens new tab last month that 23 Chinese swimmers tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) ahead of the Tokyo Games in 2021 but were allowed to compete after being cleared by a Chinese inquiry.

WADA accepted the findings of a Chinese investigation that the swimmers were inadvertently exposed to the drug and the case was not made public.

In a “frequently asked questions” (FAQ) document released days ago, WADA said there were “strong indicators that these cases could be a case of group contamination.”

“The facts and intelligence also support a finding of coordinated intentional doping such that WADA should have initiated an investigation into the source of these positive tests,” USADA wrote on Wednesday.

“But it did not, failing all clean athletes.”

A WADA spokesperson said the organisation stands by the contents of its FAQ sheet and that it “followed every process and line of inquiry when reviewing this file”.

“Based on the science and the verifiable facts, as well as external legal counsel, (WADA) decided not to take what inevitably would have been a doomed appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport,” the spokesperson said in a statement.

“To this day, no evidence has been produced that would change our position on that. Very serious and defamatory allegations continue to be made about WADA without so much as a shred of supporting evidence. WADA continues to reject those allegations as entirely baseless.”

USADA’s 16-page document, opens new tab outlined a wide array of concerns and is the latest salvo in a public spat between the two sides.

WADA said last week that it would launch an independent review over its handling of the case amid a widespread backlash, after USADA called for a complete overhaul of the global body to restore confidence ahead of the Paris Games.

Comments

200 characters