AIRLINK 74.75 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (0.62%)
BOP 4.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 4.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.92%)
DFML 39.20 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.03%)
DGKC 85.50 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (0.8%)
FCCL 21.21 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 34.18 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.18%)
FFL 9.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.52%)
GGL 10.49 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.67%)
HBL 113.60 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.53%)
HUBC 137.00 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (0.59%)
HUMNL 11.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-3.7%)
KEL 4.78 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.49%)
KOSM 4.47 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.68%)
MLCF 37.65 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 139.31 Increased By ▲ 3.11 (2.28%)
PAEL 25.69 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (2.35%)
PIAA 20.68 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (7.48%)
PIBTL 6.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.19%)
PPL 122.45 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.29%)
PRL 26.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.56%)
PTC 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.86%)
SEARL 58.25 Increased By ▲ 1.03 (1.8%)
SNGP 67.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-0.72%)
SSGC 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 8.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.48%)
TPLP 11.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.18%)
TRG 63.50 Increased By ▲ 0.69 (1.1%)
UNITY 26.61 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.42%)
WTL 1.46 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (8.15%)
BR100 7,835 Increased By 24.6 (0.31%)
BR30 25,333 Increased By 182.6 (0.73%)
KSE100 75,086 Increased By 129.7 (0.17%)
KSE30 24,136 Increased By 53.1 (0.22%)

LAHORE: A taxpayer has accused the tax department for carrying out audit proceedings under repealed provision of the law.

According to sources, the taxpayer had filed income tax return electronically, which was treated by the department as an assessment order in terms of the income tax law. However, owing to the late filing of the return, taxpayer’s case was selected for audit under a repealed provision of the law and a show cause notice was issued on account of certain discrepancies found in the return and wealth statement, which culminated in passing of amended assessment order determining income level higher than what was claimed in the original assessment by the taxpayer. Being dissatisfied, the taxpayer appealed against the amended assessment order and the appellate tribunal annulled the disputed order.

The department was of the view that the income years related to the period covered under the repealed provisions can be brought under scrutiny. Therefore, the tribunal has erred to hold that power to use the repealed provision of the law was not available to the department after its omission from the Ordinance.

But the taxpayer stressed that any such power is not available to be exercised by the officers subsequent to the omission of the provision of the law. In the meantime, the taxpayer also approached the office of Federal Tax Ombudsman, who directed the department to withdraw the audit proceedings regarding late filing of return. The FTO has also dismissed a review petition filed by the Federal Board of Revenue, followed by another rejection of representation filed before the President of Pakistan. Both the forums held that department cannot be given the right to issue notice under a repealed provision of the law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.