AIRLINK 74.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.28%)
BOP 5.01 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.6%)
CNERGY 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.45%)
DFML 42.44 Increased By ▲ 2.44 (6.1%)
DGKC 87.02 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.78%)
FCCL 21.58 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.03%)
FFBL 33.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.92%)
FFL 9.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.62%)
GGL 10.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.19%)
HBL 114.29 Increased By ▲ 1.55 (1.37%)
HUBC 139.94 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (1.82%)
HUMNL 12.25 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (7.27%)
KEL 5.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.33%)
KOSM 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-2.81%)
MLCF 38.09 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.77%)
OGDC 139.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.24%)
PAEL 25.87 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.02%)
PIAA 22.20 Increased By ▲ 1.52 (7.35%)
PIBTL 6.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 123.58 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (1.13%)
PRL 26.81 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.87%)
PTC 14.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.28%)
SEARL 58.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.76%)
SNGP 68.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-1.36%)
SSGC 10.47 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.65%)
TELE 8.39 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
TPLP 11.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
TRG 63.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-1.53%)
UNITY 26.59 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.15%)
WTL 1.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-2.07%)
BR100 7,943 Increased By 105.5 (1.35%)
BR30 25,639 Increased By 187.1 (0.73%)
KSE100 75,983 Increased By 868.6 (1.16%)
KSE30 24,445 Increased By 330.8 (1.37%)

LAHORE: Misunderstanding on the part of appropriate officer leads to loss of revenue to the customs department, said sources.

According to sources, after failing to complete final determination within due period, the said lady officer declared the provisional assessment as final one and passed an order to encash the security instrument, which was contested by the importer and secured the security at the end of the day.

According to details, one importer imported a unit of vehicle from UK and filed Goods Declaration for clearance. The assessing officer, as per practice in vogue, approached to the market player for fair assessable value, which provided two different values. The concerned officer preferred to search the value the online portal and assessed value provisionally while the differential amount of duties/taxes was secured through bank guarantee.

However, the assessing officer could not complete the final determination within a period of six months as provided by the law and directed the encashment of bank guarantee.

The appellate forum maintained that the appropriate officer is not in consonance with the purpose, mandate and language of the relevant provisions and got misled by the explanation. It said that the explanation that the provisional assessment means the amount of duties and taxes paid or secured against bank guarantee was misconstrued, as it does not include the additional amount determined on the basis of provisional assessment and the said differential amount is indeed a speculated amount of duty which could ultimately be the actual amount after a complete probe and inquiry for the final determination subject to the stipulated period.

Therefore, the differential amount secured through bank guarantee is not part of the provisional determination and when the appropriate officer failed to pass an order of final determination as per inquiry envisaged under the enabling provision, then the amount only determined as provisional assessment would be deemed as final determination and the differential amount, if already paid, be refunded and returned to the importer if secured through an instrument, i.e., pay order/bank guarantee.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.