BR100 Increased By (0.48%)
BR30 Increased By (0.42%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.3%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.19%)
BECO 6.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.17%)
BML 57.60 Increased By ▲ 4.85 (9.19%)
BOP 34.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
DCL 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.54%)
FCCL 54.08 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.35%)
FCSC 5.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.53%)
FFL 18.11 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.44%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.54%)
HUMNL 11.23 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.09%)
KEL 8.16 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
KOSM 5.49 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.04%)
MLCF 88.83 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (0.89%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.06%)
PACE 10.72 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 40.61 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (1.68%)
PIAHCLA 26.33 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.61%)
PIBTL 17.34 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.12%)
PPL 232.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.01%)
PRL 34.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
PTC 67.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.68%)
SEARL 91.61 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (0.75%)
SSGC 27.23 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
TELE 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
THCCL 64.86 Increased By ▲ 4.73 (7.87%)
TPLP 9.02 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.97%)
TREET 24.74 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.81%)
TRG 72.84 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (1.52%)
WAVES 10.73 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (7.52%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court’s Chief Justice Muhammad Ameer Bhatti on Tuesday constituted a larger bench to decide a petition filed by Chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Imran Khan against the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for barring him from heading his party following his disqualification from the National Assembly constituency of NA-95 (Mianwali).

The chief justice constituted a bench headed by Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan and also comprising Justice Shams Mahmood Mirza, Justice Shahid Karim, Justice Shehram Sarwar Chaudhry and Justice Jawad Hassan.

The single bench had already restrained the ECP from taking any adverse action against Imran Khan in proceedings to debar him from heading the party following his disqualification from National Assembly constituency NA-95, in the Toshakhana reference.

Imran Khan through his counsel challenged the assumption of jurisdiction by the ECP through the issuance of the impugned order and the notice. He argued that the ECP cannot issue the impugned notice to the petitioner since it never made a declaration against him under the article 62(1) (f) of the Constitution.

He sought the interpretation of Articles 218(3) and 219, read with Articles 4 and 5 of the Constitution and Sections 8(c) and 9 of the Election Act in the light of Article 62(f) of the Constitution.

He urged the court to hold that the findings of the ECP against the petitioner of making false statements about his assets and liabilities and subsequent disqualification were unlawful and without lawful authority.

He, therefore, asked the court to declare the notice issued to the petitioner as illegal and unconstitutional.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.