BR100 Decreased By (-0.15%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court upheld decision of a civil judge who declared that “a person who assassinates his father is not entitled to inherit from the legacy of the deceased”.

The court passed these observations in a petition of one Muhammad Farooq and also set aside the judgment and decree of the appellate court issued in favour of his brother Muhammad Ayoub, who had murdered his real father.

The court held that it was established on record that the respondent committed murder of his father; hence, under section 317 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) and as per Islamic Shariah, a patricide shall be excluded from the inheritance of his father whom he killed, himself.

The court said that the trial court rightly dismissed the suit of plaintiff whereas appellate court by committing misreading and non-reading of evidence, as well as, misapplication of law passed the impugned judgment & decree which suffers from patent illegality and irregularity.

According to the details the respondent committed murder of his father, Muhammad Ali, and a criminal case was registered under Section 302 PPC at police station Head Rajkan. After trial, the charge against him stood proved and he was awarded death penalty. During the pendency of the appeal, a compromise was affected between the parties and he was acquitted.

An inheritance mutation of Muhammad Ali deceased was incorporated in favour of his legal heirs excluding the name of the respondent on the ground for committing murder of his father.

He; therefore, filed a suit for declaration against the defendants and contended that the parties of the list are legal heirs and entitled to inherit from his legacy as per their respective shares.

A civil court passed order against him and hence he approached the appellant court and got relief.

The petitioner; therefore, approached the LHC and got set aside the decision of the appellant court.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.