BR100 Decreased By (-0.15%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) allowed a petition of a woman, Mahnoor Azhar, and held that a decree issued by a family court about the annual increase in maintenance would deem to have come into effect from the date of institution of the suit, not the date of the decree issued.

The court observed that the petitioners are entitled to 10 percent annual increase in the maintenance amount awarded to them from the date of institution of the suit.

It is a settled legal position that the purpose of the Family Act, 1964 is to protect the minors and women, who are considered to be part of the vulnerable segment of society, the court added.

The court observed that it would be against the interest and welfare of the minors to grant annual increase from the date of decree issued, particularly in cases like the one in hand where there is almost a gap of six years between the date of institution of the suit and date of final order passed.

The court said if the plea of the respondent, Lt Col Muhammad Sohail Khan, as to grant of annual increase from the date of decree is allowed, it would not only frustrate the object of the law but also put premium in the hands of a defendant. “Such an interpretation will be contrary and repugnant to the object and purpose of the law,” the court added.

The petitioners were real children, born out of the wedlock of petitioner Mahnoor and respondent Lt Col Muhammad Sohail Khan.

The petitioners had instituted a suit for maintenance in the year 2004, which was decreed by the family court on January 28, 2010.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

Adnan May 04, 2023 10:27am
Kindly mention the case number or citation number
0