AIRLINK 74.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.27%)
BOP 5.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.39%)
CNERGY 4.42 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 37.70 Increased By ▲ 1.86 (5.19%)
DGKC 91.10 Increased By ▲ 3.10 (3.52%)
FCCL 22.65 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (2.03%)
FFBL 32.91 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.58%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 11.03 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.13%)
HBL 115.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.03%)
HUBC 136.10 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.19%)
HUMNL 10.01 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.73%)
KEL 4.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 4.82 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.43%)
MLCF 40.65 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (1.93%)
OGDC 137.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.07%)
PAEL 26.60 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.64%)
PIAA 25.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.71%)
PIBTL 6.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
PPL 123.10 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.16%)
PRL 26.86 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.64%)
PTC 13.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.5%)
SEARL 58.93 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.39%)
SNGP 69.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.68%)
SSGC 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
TELE 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.47%)
TPLP 11.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.67%)
TRG 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.23%)
UNITY 26.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.27%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,852 Increased By 14.3 (0.18%)
BR30 25,544 Increased By 84.1 (0.33%)
KSE100 75,134 Increased By 202.9 (0.27%)
KSE30 24,168 Increased By 22.2 (0.09%)

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to the federal government and the Attorney General for Pakistan regarding removal of Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui as a judge of the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

A five-member special bench, headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial, heard Shaukat Siddiqui’s petition against the Supreme Judicial Council’s (SJC’s) recommendation to remove him.

Advocate Hamid Khan, representing the former judge of the IHC, submitted that the SJC proceedings against his client were held by dispensing the inquiry procedure envisaged under the Procedure of Inquiry, 2005 – Supreme Court of Pakistan as a result of that his client was deprived of open trial and due process, and the requirements associated for fair determination of the facts.

The counsel, relying upon the apex court’s judgment in the ex-CJP Chaudhry Iftikhar case, contended that the right recognised by the law with respect to a judge facing the SJC proceeding was violated.

He submitted the proceedings against his client were without jurisdiction and failed to meet the standard prescribed in the apex court judgment.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2021

Comments

Comments are closed.