AIRLINK 74.69 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.54%)
BOP 4.98 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.61%)
CNERGY 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.69%)
DFML 40.48 Increased By ▲ 1.68 (4.33%)
DGKC 86.00 Increased By ▲ 1.18 (1.39%)
FCCL 21.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.66%)
FFBL 34.16 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.12%)
FFL 9.70 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
GGL 10.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
HBL 113.60 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.53%)
HUBC 137.25 Increased By ▲ 1.05 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-3.11%)
KEL 5.23 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (11.04%)
KOSM 4.67 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (5.18%)
MLCF 37.80 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.4%)
OGDC 140.01 Increased By ▲ 3.81 (2.8%)
PAEL 25.42 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.27%)
PIAA 20.68 Increased By ▲ 1.44 (7.48%)
PIBTL 6.75 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.6%)
PPL 122.86 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (0.62%)
PRL 26.68 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
PTC 14.05 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.86%)
SEARL 59.00 Increased By ▲ 1.78 (3.11%)
SNGP 68.50 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.33%)
SSGC 10.33 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.78%)
TELE 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.19%)
TPLP 11.20 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
TRG 64.20 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (2.21%)
UNITY 26.65 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.57%)
WTL 1.43 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.93%)
BR100 7,855 Increased By 44.6 (0.57%)
BR30 25,493 Increased By 343.4 (1.37%)
KSE100 75,229 Increased By 272.2 (0.36%)
KSE30 24,178 Increased By 95 (0.39%)

ISLAMABAD: Justice Umar Ata Bandial of Supreme Court of Pakistan, on Wednesday recused himself from the Editor-in-Chief of the Jang/Geo Group, Mir Shakilur Rehman’s post-arrest bail application.

Justice Bandial, heading a three-member bench, said he could not hear this case due to personal reason.

He then referred the matter to Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed for constituting a new bench and fixed the case for hearing next week as Khawaja Haris, representing Mir Shakilur Rehman, requested to fix this case for early hearing.

Mir Shakilur Rehman on September 10th filed an appeal in the Supreme Court against the verdict of the Lahore High Court (LHC) denying him bail in a land allotment case.

A division bench of the LHC on 08 July 2020 had dismissed the writ petition of Mir Shakilur Rehman.

The petitioner said, among other things, that the Division Bench had totally misread the contents of the DG LDA’s letter dated 26.09.1990, and, thereby, committed a jurisdictional error in assuming that the petitioner was required to pay market price for the excess land sold to him in 1986, when, as a matter of fact, letter dated 26.09.1990, unambiguously, establishes that prior to 26.09.1990, only reserve price was payable for excess area.—

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.