BR100 Increased By (0.46%)
BR30 Increased By (0.64%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.41%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.52%)
BECO 5.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.17%)
BML 57.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.24%)
BOP 36.85 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.22%)
CNERGY 8.49 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.19%)
DCL 11.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.42%)
FCCL 58.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.36%)
FCSC 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.79%)
FFL 18.32 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (2.12%)
FNEL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.7%)
KEL 8.36 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.84%)
KOSM 6.62 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 107.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-0.88%)
NBP 208.29 Increased By ▲ 2.25 (1.09%)
PACE 11.35 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.61%)
PAEL 45.45 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.22%)
PIAHCLA 30.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.04%)
PIBTL 18.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.89%)
PPL 248.90 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (1.2%)
PRL 36.72 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (1.77%)
PTC 74.70 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (3.23%)
SEARL 96.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-0.42%)
SSGC 31.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.54%)
TELE 9.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.22%)
THCCL 68.70 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.31%)
TPLP 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (2.4%)
TREET 25.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.35%)
TRG 68.10 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.38%)
WAVES 11.30 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.91%)
WTL 1.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
World

WTO finds US tariffs on China breach trading rules

  • A three-person panel ruled that Washington had not shown why the tariffs, imposed after an investigation into forced transfer of technology and intellectual property. It also found that the United States had not adequately explained the choice of products hit by the tariffs.
Published September 15, 2020 Updated September 15, 2020 09:13pm
By

GENEVA/BRUSSELS: The World Trade Organization ruled on Tuesday that tariffs imposed by the United States on more than $200 billion of Chinese products in 2018 were inconsistent with global trading rules.

A three-person panel ruled that Washington had not shown why the tariffs, imposed after an investigation into forced transfer of technology and intellectual property, were a justifiable exception to Washington's obligations.

The panel found that the duties were inconsistent with trading rules because they applied only to China and were above the maximum rates to which the United States had committed.

It also found that the United States had not adequately explained the choice of products hit by the tariffs, or why the measures were necessary based on what Washington saw as Chinese companies' misappropriation and unfair competition.

"...The Panel recommends that the United States bring its measures into conformity with its obligations...," the report said.

The panel added that it had only looked into the US measures and not China's retaliation, which Washington has not challenged at the WTO. Noting "unprecedented global trade tensions", the three-person panel encouraged the two sides to work to resolve the overall dispute.

The United States could appeal against Tuesday's ruling. The case could then enter a legal void because Washington has blocked the appointment of judges to the appellate body, preventing it from convening the minimum number required to hear cases.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.