AIRLINK 79.25 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (1.1%)
BOP 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.94%)
CNERGY 4.37 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.92%)
DFML 33.19 Increased By ▲ 2.32 (7.52%)
DGKC 77.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.96 (-1.22%)
FCCL 20.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.97%)
FFBL 32.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.93%)
FFL 10.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.98%)
GGL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
HBL 117.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-0.58%)
HUBC 135.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.07%)
HUMNL 6.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
KEL 4.52 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (8.39%)
KOSM 4.77 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.85%)
MLCF 38.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.73%)
OGDC 133.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-0.82%)
PAEL 23.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.17%)
PIAA 26.72 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.3%)
PIBTL 7.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.28%)
PPL 113.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-0.4%)
PRL 27.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
PTC 14.74 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.96%)
SEARL 57.80 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (2.3%)
SNGP 67.25 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.43%)
SSGC 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.1%)
TELE 9.22 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.77%)
TPLP 11.68 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.09%)
TRG 72.40 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (1.36%)
UNITY 24.80 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.18%)
WTL 1.39 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (4.51%)
BR100 7,499 Increased By 6.5 (0.09%)
BR30 24,593 Increased By 34.9 (0.14%)
KSE100 72,085 Increased By 33.1 (0.05%)
KSE30 23,748 Decreased By -59.9 (-0.25%)

Solar tariffs in Pakistan have come down a long way in the recent past. Due to the rapid advancement in technology, the cost of equipment has gone down by a significant margin while efficiency has increased.

Recently, the power regulator Nepra determined reference tariff generation for some solar IPPs, which included 100MW plant by Zorlu Energy and 50MW plants by Helios, Gharo, Meridian and HNDS Energy Pvt. Limited.

The approved levelised tariffs for these projects range from USc 5.2622/kWh to 5.6073/kWh over applicable over a period of 25 years. Solar tariffs in Pakistan were around USc 14/KWh a couple of years back as the market was still in a nascent phase.

However, the interest by the private sector from both the local and international players has led to investment in the sector. Gradually, as Nepra took into account the falling prices of solar PV panels and other technology across the globe, the tariffs have come down from USc 14/KWh in 2015 to USc 5-6/KWh presently.

Also, as a sign of moving from a nascent to a more formally established market, the return awarded by the regulator has fall from a previous IRR of 17 percent in 2015 to 15 percent in the current tariff structure. On the other hand, the capacity utilization factor has increased from 17 percent back in 2015 to almost 22 percent in these recent solar reference tariff determinations.

However, even as the solar market moves into a more mature stage, some steps taken by the government might be construed as counter-productive to renewable energy production in the country.
For example, the reservation of “take or pay” contracts for only government run power plants as well as CPEC projects, and “take and pay” for other projects including renewables will only serve to dampen investor interest in setting up renewable energy projects.

In most jurisdictions around the world, renewable energy projects are operated under “take or pay” mode to ensure economic viability of the projects that largely have fluctuating power output. In a nutshell, even though progress has been made when it comes to reducing tariffs and enhancing energy generation, policymaking also requires clarity to encourage more private sector participation in the power sector.

Comments

Comments are closed.