BR100 Decreased By (-0.4%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.65%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.29%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.22%)
AGHA 6.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.65%)
BECO 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.15%)
BML 55.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.5%)
BOP 30.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.23%)
CNERGY 12.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.77%)
CSIL 5.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.88%)
FCCL 51.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.26%)
FFL 14.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.41%)
FNEL 1.22 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.83%)
KEL 5.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.49%)
KOSM 5.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-4.45%)
LOTCHEM 26.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
MLCF 90.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-0.99%)
NBP 161.45 Decreased By ▼ -2.74 (-1.67%)
NCPL 52.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.18%)
NPL 57.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-1.93%)
OGDC 315.40 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (0.64%)
PACE 9.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
PAEL 34.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.45%)
PIBTL 14.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-3.26%)
PPL 221.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.16%)
PRL 90.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-0.36%)
PTC 59.25 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.1%)
SSGC 23.39 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.39%)
TBL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
TELE 7.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.76%)
TPL 21.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-4.68%)
TPLP 12.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-4.3%)
TREET 21.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.84%)
TRG 54.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.58%)

ISLAMABAD: In a clear violation of Islamabad High Court’s directives, the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has reportedly denied taxpayers access to order sheets entries related to their tax assessment proceedings, declaring such official records inaccessible to the aggrieved taxpayers.

When contacted, tax lawyer Waheed Shahzad Butt described the move as “a direct violation of the binding judgments of the superior/higher judiciary,” citing landmark cases including Mukhtar Ahmad Ali vs. The Registrar, Supreme Court (2023 SCP 312), Waheed Shahzad Butt vs. Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2016 Lah 872), and Sprint Oil vs. Federal Tax Ombudsman through its Registrar (P-3346/2024).

The denial of access to order/minute sheets not only violates judicial pronouncements but also contradicts the FBR’s own administrative instructions issued decades ago in Circular-Letter No. 3(9)IT-IV/78 dated 28 March 1978 and Circular No. 15 of 1958 dated 8 October 1958, which explicitly recognize the right of taxpayers to inspect and obtain copies of such records but law is closed shop at FBR: Waheed added.

Super tax case: FBR counsel urges SC to set aside IHC ‘overreach’

By ignoring these legal and administrative mandates, the FBR field formations are acting with malice in law, creating an artificial façade of performance merely to impress the Prime Minister.

Legal experts view this development as a serious challenge to judicial supremacy and taxpayers’ constitutional right to information under Article 19A of the Constitution. The issue is likely to draw the attention of oversight bodies and judicial forums in the coming days.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.