BR100 Decreased By (-0.27%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.6%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.48%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.75%)
BECO 5.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.99%)
BML 57.90 Increased By ▲ 5.15 (9.76%)
BOP 33.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.31%)
CNERGY 8.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 11.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-4.46%)
FCCL 53.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.63%)
FCSC 5.41 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.64%)
FFL 17.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.94%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.16 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.45%)
KEL 8.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.99%)
KOSM 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.67%)
MLCF 87.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-0.33%)
NBP 184.02 Decreased By ▼ -2.46 (-1.32%)
PACE 11.50 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (7.28%)
PAEL 40.29 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.88%)
PIAHCLA 26.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.04%)
PIBTL 17.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.92%)
PPL 229.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.78 (-1.62%)
PRL 34.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.32%)
PTC 67.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-0.28%)
SEARL 90.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.02%)
SSGC 26.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-1.1%)
TELE 8.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.35 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (6.74%)
TREET 24.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.33%)
TRG 71.94 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.26%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Appellate Tribunal has upheld the order of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) against leading electronic home appliances brands for engaging in Resale Price Maintenance (RPM), a prohibited form of price fixing under the Competition Act, 2010. While maintaining the findings of contravention, the Tribunal reduced the monetary penalty imposed by the CCP to the tune of 90 million, directing the companies to deposit the amount within 30 days.

The CCP had earlier imposed penalties on the companies after concluding that both the companies in the home appliances sector had engaged in anti-competitive conduct by restricting their dealers from selling products below specific prices, offering discounts, or providing package deals.

In their defense before the Tribunal, the companies did not challenge the finding of contravention but argued that the penalty imposed was high. The Tribunal noted that the appellants demonstrated remedial actions by reimbursing to the dealers the amounts which were imposed by the companies under their price fixing policy. They also assured strict future compliance with the Competition Act.

Taking the mitigating factors into account – particularly cooperative stance and restitution to affected parties – the Tribunal reduced the penalties imposed on both companies. The Tribunal also noted the companies’ commitment to lawful business practices going forward.

The CCP urges all undertakings to refrain from all forms of price fixing, including the setting of minimum or maximum resale prices and imposing restrictions on discounts or promotional offers, as such practices constitute serious violations of competition law.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.