BR100 Increased By (0.05%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.23%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.06%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.07%)
AGHA 6.72 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.6%)
BECO 4.40 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.69%)
BML 57.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.23%)
BOP 30.42 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.23%)
CNERGY 13.13 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.08%)
CSIL 5.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.37%)
FCCL 52.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.06%)
FFL 14.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.88%)
FNEL 1.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 6.12 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.49%)
KOSM 6.19 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (8.03%)
LOTCHEM 26.53 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.26%)
MLCF 93.36 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.21%)
NBP 165.00 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.21%)
NCPL 55.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.23%)
NPL 60.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-0.46%)
OGDC 315.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.24 (-0.39%)
PACE 9.92 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.51%)
PAEL 35.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.08%)
PIBTL 14.89 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.43%)
PPL 224.50 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.06%)
PRL 93.50 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (0.52%)
PTC 60.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.27%)
SSGC 23.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.13%)
TBL 8.83 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.91%)
TELE 7.86 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.77%)
TPL 22.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.22%)
TPLP 12.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.54%)
TREET 22.29 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.59%)
TRG 56.75 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.34%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Thursday disposed of over 100 petitions challenging the crackdown on vape and e-cigarette vendors, directing authorities not to proceed against dealers until appropriate legislation is framed.

The vape dealers and shop owners from across the province had approached the court against crackdown and harassment by the police. Earlier, the petitioners' counsel argued that despite the de-sealing of shops, storeowners were still facing police harassment. A law officer, however, informed the court that neither had any formal crackdown on vape businesses been launched by the administration, nor were enforcement of actions underway. He further told the court that to regulate the trade a draft for legislation was being considered along with plans to include input from relevant stakeholders.

The court was also informed that the federal cabinet had reviewed the health risks of vaping and also discussed the significance of regulating the industry.

The court observed that the constitution guarantees the right to trade and do business and questioned how authorities could carry out enforcement without a legal framework in place. The court ruled that no action could be taken against the petitioners’ businesses until appropriate legislation is enacted.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.