BR100 Increased By (0.27%)
BR30 Increased By (0.15%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.15%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.01%)
BECO 5.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.82%)
BML 57.31 Increased By ▲ 4.56 (8.64%)
BOP 34.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.47%)
CNERGY 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
DCL 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.54%)
FCCL 53.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
FCSC 5.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.57%)
FFL 18.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.11%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.23 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.09%)
KEL 8.17 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.74%)
KOSM 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.67%)
MLCF 88.79 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (0.84%)
NBP 186.50 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.01%)
PACE 10.96 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.24%)
PAEL 40.42 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.2%)
PIAHCLA 26.26 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.34%)
PIBTL 17.33 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
PPL 232.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.78 (-0.34%)
PRL 34.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.72%)
PTC 66.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.76 (-1.12%)
SEARL 91.45 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (0.57%)
SSGC 27.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.07%)
TELE 8.70 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.52%)
THCCL 65.35 Increased By ▲ 5.22 (8.68%)
TPLP 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.02%)
TREET 24.55 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
TRG 72.63 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (1.23%)
WAVES 10.70 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (7.21%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Wednesday sought a reply from the caretaker government of Punjab on a petition challenging Punjab Anti-Corruption Establishment (Amendment) Ordinance 2023 that clipped powers of the Anti-Corruption Establishment (ACE) to register cases against public servants.

Earlier, the petitioner’s counsel contended that the impugned ordinance limited the powers of the ACE and its officers requiring them to obtain a prior permission in writing from the government to register case against the public servants.

He said the secretary of the relevant department or the chief secretary or additional chief secretary Punjab would constitute a committee to examine the complaint and decide whether to grant permission to the ACE for registration of the case.

The counsel pointed out that the law also restrained the ACE from arresting any public servant without prior permission of the government. He argued that the impugned ordinance made the anti-corruption establishment a toothless and redundant body. He further argued that the caretaker government had no mandate to make such legislation and that too through an ordinance. He asked the court to set aside the impugned ordinance for being illegal and unlawful.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.