BR100 Increased By (1.32%)
BR30 Increased By (1.33%)
KSE100 Increased By (1.37%)
KSE30 Increased By (1.47%)
AGHA 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.55%)
BECO 5.21 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.39%)
BML 59.45 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.35%)
BOP 34.37 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (2.02%)
CNERGY 10.92 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.92%)
CSIL 5.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
FCCL 54.34 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (1.12%)
FFL 16.83 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.25%)
FNEL 1.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.82%)
KEL 7.43 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.06%)
KOSM 5.72 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.42%)
LOTCHEM 30.02 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (1.25%)
MLCF 97.40 Increased By ▲ 1.04 (1.08%)
NBP 205.80 Increased By ▲ 2.27 (1.12%)
NCPL 58.49 Increased By ▲ 1.64 (2.88%)
NPL 69.40 Increased By ▲ 2.09 (3.11%)
OGDC 321.25 Increased By ▲ 3.03 (0.95%)
PACE 10.76 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.22%)
PAEL 42.55 Increased By ▲ 0.78 (1.87%)
PIBTL 17.17 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (2.14%)
PPL 223.65 Increased By ▲ 3.48 (1.58%)
PRL 52.75 Increased By ▲ 3.70 (7.54%)
PTC 70.91 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (1.29%)
SSGC 29.61 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (1.61%)
TBL 9.78 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
TELE 8.98 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.81%)
TPL 17.30 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.76%)
TPLP 12.85 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (2.72%)
TREET 22.90 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.37%)
TRG 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (0.63%)

LAHORE: Taxpayers involved in money laundering prefer to challenge the jurisdiction of the income tax department instead of proving their innocence, said sources.

According to the sources, the taxpayers take the plea that the accounts of the company are being regularly audited and the company and the directors are being assessed as a taxpayer since last many years with no complaint of any concealment of income. Therefore, the proceedings initiated against them under the Anti Money Laundering Act (AMLA) are illegal and without jurisdiction.

They said the taxpayers also argue that since no penal consequence of criminal nature has been provided in the Income Tax Ordinance in case of any money laundering or tax evasion of Rs10 million and above, therefore, the tax department has no jurisdiction to lodge a complaint of money laundering against them, as it is only the jurisdiction of AMLA.

Those involved in money laundering also take the plea that the department has initiated anti money laundering proceedings against them when no complaint of incorrect or inaccurate submission of the statutory requirements against the company or its directors is under consideration of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP).

According to the sources, the ultra rich taxpayers spend hefty pints to approach the highest appellate forums without realizing that criminal matters couldn’t be taken up in writ petitions since the same require detailed deliberation, lengthy arguments, recording of evidence and examination of witnesses etc.

They pointed out that the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 clearly reveals that in respect of matters which concerns evasion of taxes over Rs10 million or above, the same is referable to be dealt with under special law of AMLA, therefore, the plea that the department has no jurisdiction is always out of place and incorrect. They added that it is the directorate general office, which has been given jurisdiction to evaluate such type of matters.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.