BR100 Decreased By (-0.91%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.47%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.78%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.75%)
AGHA 6.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.15%)
BECO 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.46%)
BML 56.17 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-2.01%)
BOP 30.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-0.76%)
CNERGY 12.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.07%)
CSIL 5.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.85%)
FCCL 51.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-2.16%)
FFL 14.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.56%)
FNEL 1.21 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (8.04%)
KEL 6.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.49%)
KOSM 5.84 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.92%)
LOTCHEM 26.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.1%)
MLCF 91.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.93 (-2.07%)
NBP 164.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-0.29%)
NCPL 53.18 Decreased By ▼ -2.48 (-4.46%)
NPL 59.12 Decreased By ▼ -2.04 (-3.34%)
OGDC 313.39 Decreased By ▼ -3.34 (-1.05%)
PACE 9.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.01%)
PAEL 35.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.09%)
PIBTL 14.71 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.2%)
PPL 221.36 Decreased By ▼ -5.55 (-2.45%)
PRL 91.22 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-1.94%)
PTC 59.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.07 (-1.78%)
SSGC 23.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-2.14%)
TBL 8.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.44%)
TPL 22.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.43%)
TPLP 12.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-3.16%)
TREET 21.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-1.94%)
TRG 55.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.36%)

ISLAMABAD: Tax experts have urged the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to correct the errors and omissions of earlier enactments/ notifications through the upcoming Finance Bill 2023.

Tax experts stated that invariably in every Finance Act, there are multiple amendments made to correct the drafting errors and omissions of earlier enactments and these lapses by the Policy Wing of the FBR usually create uncertainty and lead to avoidable litigation.

Tax experts have urged the FBR to improve its track record in the forthcoming budget.

When contacted, Shahid Jami, a Lahore-based tax professional explained with an illustration that when an amendment is intended in any section or schedule of the taxing statute any corresponding amendment required elsewhere is overlooked.

He explained that in 2021 the milk and many other products were made taxable for the levy of sales tax if sold retail in packing under a brand name or trademark. But the key expression of “retail packing” used in Table II of the Sixth Schedule was not defined in section 2 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 containing definitions of such key expressions used in the Act. Obviously, retail packing would mean packing meant for the general body of consumers for their consumption. But it should have been defined especially when related expressions of “retail price” and “retailer” stood defined. He urged that the needful is done in this Finance Bill.

Jami explained that similarly at times an amendment in the Act warrants a corresponding amendment in the relevant SRO but the same is also overlooked. For example through Finance Act 2021 in section 159(1)( c) of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 the words of “ section 100C “ were substituted with the words of “this Ordinance” but the corresponding amendment in SRO.715(I)/2020 has not been made in Rule 40D(2)(a).

Jami further explained that though FBR in its letter dated 19 April 2023 addressed to the FTO has admitted the anomaly and has also enclosed the draft amending SRO yet the same has not been issued in spite of elapse of almost 40 days after admission. He urged that like in developed countries and even India, the FBR should publish the draft of proposed amendments seeking comments from taxpayers and experts.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.