BR100 Increased By (0.73%)
BR30 Increased By (0.94%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.81%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.9%)
BECO 5.39 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.32%)
BML 56.52 Increased By ▲ 1.43 (2.6%)
BOP 35.20 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.46%)
CNERGY 8.18 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.11%)
DCL 11.45 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.79%)
FCCL 57.70 Increased By ▲ 1.51 (2.69%)
FCSC 5.10 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.8%)
FFL 17.73 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.28%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.81%)
HUMNL 11.17 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.2%)
KEL 8.67 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.17%)
KOSM 6.57 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.23%)
MLCF 107.30 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (0.74%)
NBP 200.50 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (0.37%)
PACE 11.11 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.82%)
PAEL 45.64 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (1.42%)
PIAHCLA 30.20 Increased By ▲ 1.63 (5.71%)
PIBTL 18.44 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.93%)
PPL 247.04 Increased By ▲ 2.55 (1.04%)
PRL 35.18 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (0.69%)
PTC 65.99 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.26%)
SEARL 94.89 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.89%)
SSGC 30.90 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.23%)
TELE 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.15%)
THCCL 66.00 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (1.55%)
TPLP 10.65 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (3.8%)
TREET 25.13 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (1.05%)
TRG 63.91 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.87%)
WAVES 10.85 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.88%)
WTL 1.26 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.61%)
Pakistan

IHC reserves decision on seeking live coverage of court proceedings case

  • After listening arguments, the court reserved the decision on maintainability of the case.
Published April 1, 2021 Updated April 1, 2021 06:36pm
By

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday reserved its judgment on maintainability of a petition seeking live broadcasting of proceedings on pubic interests cases.

Justice Aamer Farooq of IHC reserved the decision after listening arguments from petitioner's lawyer Barrister Ammar Ziauddin.

The lawyer adopted the stance that there were examples of live coverage of court proceedings in world states including America, Australia, China and India. The court noted that the petitioner had attached downloaded documents with his case and asked him to share others if he had. The lawyer then presented the copy of Indian Supreme Court to the bench regarding live coverage of court proceeding.

He argued that live coverage would also ensure the provision of freedom of expression in the country. Justice Farooq remarked that anyone could visit courts to view the proceedings.

The lawyer said that in modern era several countries had adopted the technology for live broadcasting of court proceedings. He said that this would also improve the public trust on judicial system.

After listening arguments, the court reserved the decision on maintainability of the case.

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.