BR100 Decreased By (-0.88%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.29%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.8%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.88%)
BECO 5.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.06%)
BML 59.50 Increased By ▲ 1.60 (2.76%)
BOP 33.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-0.89%)
CNERGY 8.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.97%)
FCCL 52.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-1.4%)
FCSC 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.04%)
FFL 17.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.18%)
FNEL 1.30 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 10.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.08%)
KEL 7.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.12%)
KOSM 5.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.65%)
MLCF 85.65 Decreased By ▼ -1.75 (-2%)
NBP 181.94 Decreased By ▼ -2.30 (-1.25%)
PACE 11.65 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.26%)
PAEL 39.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.42%)
PIAHCLA 25.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-1.11%)
PIBTL 17.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.82%)
PPL 225.78 Decreased By ▼ -2.95 (-1.29%)
PRL 34.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.01%)
PTC 66.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.63%)
SEARL 89.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-1.46%)
SSGC 26.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-1.3%)
TELE 8.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.17%)
THCCL 67.51 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (2.07%)
TPLP 9.50 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.82%)
TREET 24.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-1.35%)
TRG 70.46 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.61%)
WAVES 10.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.27%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.56%)
Business & Finance

IHC seeks FBR’s reply over imposing sales tax at lawyers’ case

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for submission of
Published August 29, 2019 Updated August 29, 2019 02:02pm

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for submission of reply in a petition challenging sales tax imposed on lawyers by FBR.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah also rejected the stay order plea by the petitioner against the FBR orders.

The Chief Justice sought reply from FBR before the next hearing in the petition filed by advocate Afnan Karim Kundi.

Athar Minallah remarked that Court to decide either such tax was being imposed over lawyers or it was an indirect tax over complainants.

He remarked that how could be provision of speedy justice possible with such burden at complainants.

Additional Attorney General maintained that such tax can be refunded over the conclusion of the case.

The court has to see if there is any obstacle to the delivery of justice with such tax or not, the court observed.

Athar Minallah remarked that the delivery of justice was already not happening as it should be.

The hearing of the case was adjourned till September 10.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2019
 

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.