AIRLINK 74.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.01%)
BOP 4.95 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.23%)
DFML 39.26 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.19%)
DGKC 85.34 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (0.61%)
FCCL 21.33 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.57%)
FFBL 33.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.11%)
FFL 9.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
GGL 10.45 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.29%)
HBL 113.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 136.99 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (0.58%)
HUMNL 11.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.34%)
KEL 4.74 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.64%)
KOSM 4.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.45%)
MLCF 37.85 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.53%)
OGDC 137.88 Increased By ▲ 1.68 (1.23%)
PAEL 25.27 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.68%)
PIAA 20.12 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (4.57%)
PIBTL 6.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.19%)
PPL 122.31 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.17%)
PRL 26.85 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.75%)
PTC 13.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.5%)
SEARL 57.61 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (0.68%)
SNGP 67.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.59%)
SSGC 10.32 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.68%)
TELE 8.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.48%)
TPLP 11.15 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.18%)
TRG 63.22 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.65%)
UNITY 26.60 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.38%)
WTL 1.43 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.93%)
BR100 7,811 Increased By 1.2 (0.02%)
BR30 25,250 Increased By 99.9 (0.4%)
KSE100 74,969 Increased By 12.8 (0.02%)
KSE30 24,091 Increased By 7.4 (0.03%)

What is an anomaly? In 2012, Pakistan’s cotton recorded its highest-ever yield at 815 kg per hectare. According to Annual Economic Survey that year, the increased productivity and profitability from lint crop could be attributed to “use of BT cotton, and control of widespread attack of cotton leaf curl virus, and sucking pests”. Aggregate area cropped had recorded slight up tick too, suggesting that the crop was finally set to stage a turnaround.

Recall that this was the same year when global cotton prices had reached their historical peak after the widespread destruction of crop in Pakistan in the aftermath of 2011 floods. Cotton’s high yield, it could be argued, were a result of farmers of all sizes increasing investment on crop via improved fertilizer and pesticide application, in response to better financial returns.

The reality was starkly different. 2012, in fact, was a year of anomaly. While cultivation had improved in Punjab, area in Sindh had reduced by almost half of long term-average, at just 260 thousand hectares. While Punjab managed to rebound, small-scale growers in Sindh were still reeling from devastation of floods.

It is important to recall here that historically, cotton has performed better in Sindh than Punjab, with yield in southern region averaging above 1,050 hectares since 2010, a feat Punjab yet to be achieved by growers in Punjab. Within Sindh, cotton cultivation is primarily dominated in the central Mirpurkhas division which incidentally also has the highest yield.

Back to 2012. Mirpurkhas division saw a decline of over 87 percent in area under cultivation, as did other traditional cotton regions in Hyderabad and Sukkur divisions. But as the historical yield illustration shows, cotton yield shot up to over four thousand kg per hectare in Mirpurkhas; with yield in its Sanghar district closing in at 5,700 hectares.

What explains the anomaly? Sanghar district, for example, saw cotton acreage of just 13 thousand hectares versus 130 thousand hectares on average. The elimination of small growers due to floods, in fact revealed the remarkable yields achieved by few large-scale progressive farmers in the region, who usually get lost in annual averages of economic survey.

The story is similar for other crops such as maize, sugarcane and rice, where progressive farmers across the country have been achieving target yields competitive with global averages. Yet, they often go unnoticed, in the pedantic reviews and surveys that talk about Pakistan’s generic agriculture woes. The need is to not only highlight these anomalies, but to popularize their best practices in order to address Pakistan’s abysmal crop yields.

Comments

Comments are closed.