AIRLINK 72.18 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (0.68%)
BOP 4.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.4%)
CNERGY 4.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.91%)
DFML 28.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.21%)
DGKC 81.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-1.33%)
FCCL 21.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-2.05%)
FFBL 33.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.10 (-3.22%)
FFL 9.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.18%)
GGL 10.48 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (3.56%)
HBL 114.00 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (0.88%)
HUBC 140.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.36%)
HUMNL 9.03 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (12.45%)
KEL 4.73 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (7.99%)
KOSM 4.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.67%)
MLCF 37.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-0.95%)
OGDC 133.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.74%)
PAEL 25.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.02 (-3.83%)
PIAA 23.98 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-5.59%)
PIBTL 6.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.07%)
PPL 122.62 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.55%)
PRL 27.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-2.38%)
PTC 13.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.45%)
SEARL 56.62 Increased By ▲ 1.73 (3.15%)
SNGP 69.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-0.66%)
SSGC 10.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.58%)
TELE 8.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.59%)
TPLP 11.28 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (3.01%)
TRG 61.21 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.51%)
UNITY 25.33 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.44%)
WTL 1.50 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (17.19%)
BR100 7,630 Decreased By -8.3 (-0.11%)
BR30 24,990 Increased By 18.4 (0.07%)
KSE100 72,602 Decreased By -159.4 (-0.22%)
KSE30 23,539 Decreased By -86.6 (-0.37%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday extended interim pre-arrest bail of Nasir Janjua, who was nominated as an accused by the former accountability court Judge Mohammad Arshad Malik in the video leak case. A single bench of IHC comprising acting Chief Justice Aamer Farooq heard the case and barred the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) from arresting Janjua by extending his interim pre-arrest bail for one day.
During the hearing, Janjua's counsel Qamar Afzal Afzal in his arguments said his client has the bail for that day (Tuesday) and he cannot be arrested in this regard. He said the FIA team is waiting outside the court to arrest his client but his client has bail till 12:00am midnight. Later, the court extended his bail for a day and directed the FIA not to arrest him.
Last week, Janjua had filed a petition in the IHC seeking pre-arrest bail in case of blackmailing the accountability court judge and the court had granted the pre-arrest bail to him against the surety bonds worth of Rs 200,000 till July 30. Nasir Janjua, in his pre-arrest bail petition, stated that all the allegations levelled against him regarding the video scandal are baseless. The petition stated that Janjua has nothing to do with preparation of video, participation in video exhibition or displaying it. The petitioner is innocent and ready to join the investigation whenever required.
Judge Arshad Malik, in the FIR registered under various sections of Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) with Cyber Crime Reporting Centre of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), claimed that his old acquaintance Mian Tariq secretly made his allegedly 'immoral video' while he was serving as additional district and sessions judge in Multan and sold it to some people belong to Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N).
He further alleged that "a group of people including Nasir Janjua, Nasir Butt, Khurram Yousuf and Mehr Ghulam Jilani started to put pressure on me to help Mian Nawaz Sharif, who was earlier convicted by me in a NAB reference." Judge Malik had convicted Nawaz Sharif in the Al Azizia reference and sentenced him to 7-year imprisonment on Dec 24 last year. According to the judge, "Due to fear of exposure of the Multan video" he met Nawaz Sharif in Jati Umra on April 6, this year, and Hussain Nawaz in Saudi Arabia on June 1. "Nasir Butt pressurised me to get his assistance in preparation of the grounds for appeals in Al Azizia and Flagship references."
In the petition, Nasir Janjua stated that primarily there were three allegations which brought the case within the ambit of PECA; (i) securing video of some person, (ii) releasing the said video through any mode i.e. social media or otherwise in public, (iii) and utilisation of the said conversation /video/recording etc in any manner derogatory to the provision of law on the subject. His petition claimed that "all the above allegations are not attracted or not even levelled to the extent of petitioner."

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.