BR100 Decreased By (-0.25%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.64%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-3.32%)
BML 57.90 Increased By ▲ 5.15 (9.76%)
BOP 33.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.34%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-4.46%)
FCCL 53.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.74%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.05%)
FNEL 1.30 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 11.11 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1%)
KEL 8.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.11%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-0.74%)
NBP 184.24 Decreased By ▼ -2.24 (-1.2%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.25 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.78%)
PIAHCLA 26.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.19%)
PIBTL 17.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.04%)
PPL 228.73 Decreased By ▼ -4.05 (-1.74%)
PRL 34.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-1.32%)
PTC 67.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.03%)
SEARL 90.93 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 26.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-1.25%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.33 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (6.51%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.12%)
TRG 71.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.2%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

“On a scale of one to ten what are our skills in mediation?”

“We mediated talks between China and the US way back in the early 1970s and enabled Nixon to visit China in 1972 that paved the way for the historic Shanghai communiqué…”

“The same Nixon who resigned in 1974, no he wasn’t indicted but the Watergate scandal…”

“See our justice system works better. Wasn’t Musharraf indicted on multiple charges including two murder charges and suspending the constitution…”

“OK so Nixon faced one charge and Musharraf multiple charges and so what?”

“So nothing but for your information Nixon was not indicted for opening lines of communication with China though perhaps that charge can be added posthumously given American official anger against the Chinese transforming themselves into peer competitors in a few decades. Reports suggest that the US is getting ready for a war with China by 2030 is it?”

“Not sure but anyway when I asked about our mediating skills…”

“Hey isn’t China returning the favour: mediating between us and the Taliban?”

“Right, no, I was referring to our mediation between the US and Iran – given that the position of the protagonists is so wide apart it’s not our fault…”

“Look at the glass as half full! We could well succeed. By the way did you note that in the two major ongoing conflicts the position of the anti-Western countries is the same.”

“Because one of the protagonist is common – the US reportedly supports Ukraine in identifying targets for missile attacks on Russian soil covertly while the US is more overt in the attacks on Iran…”

“Hmmm not anymore I think, anyway China is supporting the Iranians.”

“True but both Russia and Iran’s stance is the same: we do not want a temporary ceasefire that would enable their protagonists to rearm themselves and attack again – and need I add the Russian and Iranian experience provides ample proof of this charge which is why that they want to end the war definitively — an agreement with appropriate guarantees that would not allow the US and/or Israel to attack Iran ever again.”

“Well ever is a long time.”

“Yes but…”

“For Israel ever could be the day after the ceasefire agreement is signed. I mean look at Gaza, and the West Bank and Lebanon…”

“The day after or the same day?”

“You have caught on.”

Copyright Business Recorder, 2026

Comments

200 characters remaining