BR100 Increased By (0.41%)
BR30 Increased By (0%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.49%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.56%)
AGHA 7.87 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.55%)
BECO 5.20 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
BML 57.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-1.36%)
BOP 34.15 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.37%)
CNERGY 10.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-2.83%)
CSIL 5.41 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.08%)
FCCL 54.75 Increased By ▲ 1.01 (1.88%)
FFL 16.61 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.91%)
FNEL 1.25 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (2.46%)
KEL 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.37%)
KOSM 5.77 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (2.3%)
LOTCHEM 29.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.54%)
MLCF 95.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.21 (-1.26%)
NBP 204.00 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.23%)
NCPL 57.55 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.23%)
NPL 68.70 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (2.07%)
OGDC 317.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.22 (-0.38%)
PACE 10.78 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.41%)
PAEL 43.35 Increased By ▲ 1.58 (3.78%)
PIBTL 16.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.36%)
PPL 220.59 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (0.19%)
PRL 50.20 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (2.34%)
PTC 70.76 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (1.07%)
SSGC 28.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-2.54%)
TBL 9.85 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
TELE 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.34%)
TPL 18.48 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (7.63%)
TPLP 13.06 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (4.4%)
TREET 22.71 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.53%)
TRG 59.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.7%)

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) dismissed a petition of a private company with a cost of rupees one million for tempering with the court’s order and observed that the courts are not mere dispute resolution forums, they are vested with the solemn duty to uphold the public confidence in the administration of justice.

The court directed the registrar LHC to get criminal case registered against the delinquents in accordance with law. The court also ordered to deposit the cost amount in the bank account of the diagnostic centre of Lahore High Court Bar Association and receipt should be placed on record failing which the same shall be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

The court said, no person can be permitted to forge, manipulate, or misuse judicial orders for personal or institutional gain. The court observed that authenticity of judicial orders is not a matter of procedural formality; it is the very essence of rule of law.

The court said any assault on the credibility of their proceedings strikes at the very soul of justice and cannot be tolerated under any circumstance. The court said the judicial process cannot and shall not be permitted to be reduced to an arena of strategic deceit and added the judicial orders carry the imprimatur of the rule of law, and any tampering therewith strikes at the very heart of the institutional integrity.

The petitioner company M/s Pakmaco (Pvt.) Ltd sought to place the entire blame on a former employee, asserting that he on his own used the email account to transmit the forged and tampered order and has since left the organization.

The court observed that motive, opportunity, and advantage all point toward the culpability of the petitioner company, acting through its authorized representatives. The court said that the record clearly reflects that the forged order was used to suspend or delay a procurement process initiated by the SNGPL in which the petitioner company was a participant.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.