AIRLINK 154.88 Increased By ▲ 4.63 (3.08%)
BOP 9.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.58%)
CNERGY 7.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.21%)
CPHL 78.24 Increased By ▲ 7.11 (10%)
FCCL 47.53 Increased By ▲ 1.82 (3.98%)
FFL 14.49 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.05%)
FLYNG 40.87 Increased By ▲ 3.72 (10.01%)
HUBC 138.71 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (0.26%)
HUMNL 12.93 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (3.11%)
KEL 4.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-4.82%)
KOSM 5.16 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.41%)
MLCF 75.92 Increased By ▲ 6.27 (9%)
OGDC 218.66 Increased By ▲ 15.65 (7.71%)
PACE 5.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.79%)
PAEL 45.30 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.4%)
PIAHCLA 14.80 Increased By ▲ 1.35 (10.04%)
PIBTL 8.64 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.23%)
POWER 15.13 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1%)
PPL 168.03 Increased By ▲ 15.28 (10%)
PRL 29.55 Increased By ▲ 2.53 (9.36%)
PTC 20.13 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (4.35%)
SEARL 82.57 Increased By ▲ 7.51 (10.01%)
SSGC 32.79 Increased By ▲ 2.33 (7.65%)
SYM 14.23 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (2.01%)
TELE 6.99 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.16%)
TPLP 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
TRG 63.29 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (2.25%)
WAVESAPP 9.05 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.23%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-4.55%)
YOUW 3.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-3.22%)
BR100 12,644 Increased By 241 (1.94%)
BR30 37,293 Increased By 1733.2 (4.87%)
KSE100 118,576 Increased By 1278.2 (1.09%)
KSE30 36,302 Increased By 462.9 (1.29%)
Pakistan

Diplomatic setback for India at UNSC as Pakistan, China block pro-India statement on Pahalgam attack

  • UNSC avoids term 'Indian-administered Kashmir,' instead using 'Jammu and Kashmir,' reinforcing its internationally disputed status
  • Council urges 'all relevant authorities' to cooperate, implicitly acknowledging Pakistan’s role as a stakeholder
Published April 27, 2025

In a significant diplomatic development, India faced a setback at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as Pakistan, backed by China, blocked New Delhi’s attempts to frame the Pahalgam attack in its favor, according to Aaj News.

The UNSC’s condemnation of the April 22 attack, which came after a four-day delay, notably avoided direct reference to the Indian government, instead calling for cooperation with “all relevant authorities.”

Pakistan open to ‘neutral, transparent’ probe into Pahalgam attack: PM Shehbaz

Pakistan, currently a non-permanent member of the Security Council, strongly condemned the attack while working to ensure the statement remained balanced.

Islamabad, in close coordination with Beijing, pushed back against language that would have granted India advantage in the disputed region of Jammu and Kashmir, according to Aaj News.

In a notable shift, the UNSC statement on the Pahalgam attack included language acknowledging Pakistan’s sovereignty claim over Jammu and Kashmir, while also condemning the violence.

UNSC’s refusal to recognize Kashmir as Indian territory deals blow to New Delhi’s annexation claims post-2019.

Unlike the 2019 Pulwama attack, where the UNSC statement emphasized direct cooperation with the Indian government, this time the wording was carefully neutral.

Pakistan also ensured that India’s attempt to include “Pahalgam” as part of its claimed territory was omitted, while maintaining the internationally recognized term “Jammu and Kashmir.

“Terrorism in all its forms and manifestations constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security,” the ambassadors reaffirmed, while emphasizing that such acts are “criminal and unjustifiable, regardless of their motivation, wherever, whenever, and by whomsoever committed.”

India’s delayed reaction to the attack—issuing a condemnation only on April 26, four days after the incident—has also drawn scrutiny.

Pakistan has categorically denied any involvement in the attack, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif reiterating Islamabad’s willingness to cooperate with neutral investigations while rejecting what he called “India’s baseless allegations.”

The episode underscores the ongoing geopolitical tussle at the UN, where Pakistan and China have consistently challenged India’s efforts to isolate Islamabad on the Kashmir issue.

Comments

200 characters