BR100 Increased By (0.49%)
BR30 Increased By (0.64%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.32%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.29%)
BECO 6.14 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (6.41%)
BML 52.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-0.91%)
BOP 34.28 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.85%)
CNERGY 8.14 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.37%)
DCL 12.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.57%)
FCCL 53.29 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (0.87%)
FCSC 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.97%)
FFL 18.03 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.45%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 10.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 8.09 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.87%)
KOSM 5.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.72%)
MLCF 86.98 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.54%)
NBP 186.50 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (0.72%)
PACE 10.68 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.95%)
PAEL 39.88 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.17%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.46%)
PIBTL 16.90 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.38%)
PPL 228.99 Increased By ▲ 0.81 (0.35%)
PRL 34.85 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.49%)
PTC 66.67 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (2.05%)
SEARL 90.67 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.6%)
SSGC 27.00 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.5%)
TELE 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.5%)
THCCL 58.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.36%)
TPLP 8.62 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (4.87%)
TREET 24.60 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.29%)
TRG 69.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.11%)
WAVES 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
WTL 1.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has rejected an order passed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) and ruled that refund cannot be blocked due to pendency of any tax reference before the high court.

It is reliably learnt that a landmark order has been passed by IHC and ruled that merely because the petitioner chose to avail a remedy before the FTO who has stayed his hand for the time being doesn’t mean that the tax department has carte blanche to refuse to comply with the order of the Tribunal.

IHC order stated, “Contention that because a tax reference has been pending against the refund order passed by the Tribunal, wherein no injunctive order has been issued, a refund has not been processed.

FTO orders’ implementation: IHC issues show cause notice to CIR for filing false statements

He has failed to adduce any provision of law or any case law, which establishes that the filing of a reference creating sufficient cause for the tax department to defy an order of the Tribunal which is in the field. Grievance emanates from the order of the FTO, who chose not to proceed further on grounds of maladministration pursuant to order given that the matter was subjudice. This is also insufficient basis for the question of maintainability of the petition.

The Tribunal’s order directed the tax authorities to process a refund that is in the field and has not been complied with. Merely because the petitioner chose to avail a remedy before the FTO who has stayed his hand for the time being doesn’t mean that the tax department has carte blanche to refuse to comply with the order of the Tribunal, IHC order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.

T Sep 09, 2024 09:14am
fto, fbr and the courts all wandering clueless on modern rules of business, no wonder pakistan looks like a lost buffalo in arbitrations.
0
Faiz Jalib Sep 09, 2024 11:43am
Every official: My is the law of the land. "Too many applications hence the delay". Instead of honouring their commitments and working towards halal rozi, they come up with the flimsiest of excuses
0