BR100 Decreased By (-1.32%)
BR30 Decreased By (-1.4%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-1.01%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-1.12%)
AGHA 7.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.92%)
BECO 5.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.15%)
BML 57.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.7%)
BOP 33.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 9.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.7%)
CSIL 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
FCCL 53.15 Decreased By ▼ -1.55 (-2.83%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.54%)
FNEL 1.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.63%)
KEL 7.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.89%)
KOSM 5.82 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.87%)
LOTCHEM 29.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.89%)
MLCF 92.18 Decreased By ▼ -2.18 (-2.31%)
NBP 201.20 Decreased By ▼ -1.85 (-0.91%)
NCPL 56.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-0.7%)
NPL 66.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-1.76%)
OGDC 314.35 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-0.47%)
PACE 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.32%)
PAEL 42.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.19 (-2.75%)
PIBTL 16.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.91%)
PPL 216.00 Decreased By ▼ -3.78 (-1.72%)
PRL 50.45 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (2.56%)
PTC 69.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.03 (-1.46%)
SSGC 27.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.25 (-4.42%)
TBL 9.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.01%)
TELE 8.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-2.16%)
TPL 18.26 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.11%)
TPLP 13.49 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.66%)
TREET 22.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.97%)
TRG 59.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.64 (-1.06%)

ISLAMABAD: The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has confirmed its exclusive jurisdiction to prevent and prohibit anti-competitive practices under Chapter II, including Section 10(d) of the Competition Act, 2010. The Section empowers the Commission to restore and maintain market competition, especially in cases of deceptive marketing practices.

A Commission’s bench passed an order affirming its exclusive jurisdiction, which reinforces that the Competition Act of 2010 serves as the specialized legal framework for regulating anti-competitive practices throughout Pakistan.

The CCP’s consistent application of Section 10 in multiple rulings underscores its unwavering commitment to addressing specific marketing malpractices under its jurisdiction.

The order is issued to address a jurisdictional challenge raised by M/s S M Foods Makers Limited (SFML) and M/s Volka Foods Limited (VFL).

Upon complaints filed by M/s Ismail Industries Limited, M/s English Biscuits Limited, and M/s Hilal Foods Limited, the CCP initiated an inquiry into the alleged fraudulent use of trademarks and product packaging by SFML and VFL.

The inquiry led to issuance of show-cause notices to SFML and VFL. In response, SFML filed writ petitions before the Lahore High Court (Multan Bench), challenging the CCP’s jurisdiction.

The CCP’s order outlines its authority to combat deceptive marketing practices, such as fraudulent trademark use, firm names, and product packaging, as they are considered distortions of competition that deceive consumers.

The order also dismissed any perceived conflict of jurisdiction with the Intellectual Property Organization (IPO), concluding that the Competition Act, 2010, specifically addresses anti-competitive practices, including deceptive marketing, without encroaching on the IPO’s mandate.

Following this jurisdictional ruling, the CCP will proceed with hearings on the substantive merits of the case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.