AGL 40.13 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.3%)
AIRLINK 189.43 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (0.77%)
BOP 10.34 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.17%)
CNERGY 7.21 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.41%)
DCL 10.21 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.59%)
DFML 41.80 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.55%)
DGKC 108.63 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (0.67%)
FCCL 38.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1.05%)
FFBL 89.91 Increased By ▲ 7.89 (9.62%)
FFL 15.02 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.81%)
HUBC 123.23 Increased By ▲ 3.77 (3.16%)
HUMNL 14.45 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (2.85%)
KEL 6.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.94%)
KOSM 8.40 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (4.09%)
MLCF 49.47 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 74.82 Increased By ▲ 1.16 (1.57%)
OGDC 213.41 Increased By ▲ 8.56 (4.18%)
PAEL 32.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.7%)
PIBTL 9.07 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (12.39%)
PPL 199.93 Increased By ▲ 14.52 (7.83%)
PRL 34.55 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (2.8%)
PTC 27.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.66%)
SEARL 118.19 Decreased By ▼ -1.63 (-1.36%)
TELE 9.88 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.96%)
TOMCL 35.42 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.34%)
TPLP 12.57 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (2.61%)
TREET 22.29 Increased By ▲ 2.03 (10.02%)
TRG 60.90 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.2%)
UNITY 36.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.30 (-3.42%)
WTL 1.79 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (8.48%)
BR100 12,159 Increased By 386.9 (3.29%)
BR30 37,770 Increased By 1185.5 (3.24%)
KSE100 114,181 Increased By 3370.3 (3.04%)
KSE30 35,701 Increased By 1272.1 (3.69%)

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC), Tuesday, turned down a petition seeking disqualification of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Founder Imran Khan for concealing his alleged daughter Tyrian White.

A larger bench of IHC comprising Justice Tariq Mahmood Jahangiri, Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, and Justice Saman Raffat Imtiaz conducted a hearing of the case seeking the PTI founder’s disqualification on the grounds that he did not declare his alleged daughter in his nomination papers and rejected the same.

During the hearing, Hamid Ali Shah advocate appeared before the court on behalf of petitioner Mohammad Sajid and informed the bench that the counsel Salman Akram Raja had sought an adjournment in the matter.

However, PTI lawyer Naeem Haider Panjotha intervened and said that the verdict in this case was announced on May 10, last year, and was subsequently, uploaded on the court’s website.

He added that this case has also been cited by the six IHC judges in their letter written to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) regarding interference of spy agencies in judicial matters.

At this, Justice Jahangiri observed that two of the three judges hearing the case declared the application inadmissible. He asked that what will be the effect after the decision of two judges? The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the high court’s chief justice did not sign the order.

The judge again asked Hamid about the possible effect of an order when two judges had signed it. Hamid then sought two to three weeks’ time to prepare his arguments.

However, the judge asked how could the court give a date for a hearing in a case that has already been rejected. Hamid stated that he required some time to seek judicial assistance.

Justice Jahangiri said that the IHC CJ recused himself from the bench and two judges had given their verdict. The court said that the disqualification plea against Khan had already been dismissed by the bench. It added that the majority decision has already been issued.

This matter had been pending since May 2023 after a three-member bench hearing the case was dissolved by IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq.

The decision was taken after the opinions of two judges regarding the plea’s maintainability were uploaded on the court’s website.

The bench comprising IHC CJ Aamer Farooq, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, and Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir had reserved the verdict in the case on March 30 last year. However, Justice Kayani and Justice Tahir had opined against the petition’s maintainability and uploaded their opinion on the IHC’s official website which was later removed.

The high court explained that without the signature of the bench head Justice Farooq, the opinion of two judges could not declare the bench’s verdict and uploaded to the court’s website.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.