AGHA 7.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BECO 5.22 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.58%)
BML 59.00 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.58%)
BOP 34.15 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.37%)
CNERGY 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.32%)
CSIL 5.44 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.64%)
FCCL 54.30 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (1.04%)
FFL 16.59 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.79%)
FNEL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
KEL 7.35 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.96%)
KOSM 5.66 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.35%)
LOTCHEM 29.94 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.98%)
MLCF 97.50 Increased By ▲ 1.14 (1.18%)
NBP 206.75 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (1.58%)
NCPL 57.70 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (1.5%)
NPL 68.30 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (1.47%)
OGDC 319.88 Increased By ▲ 1.66 (0.52%)
PACE 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.6%)
PAEL 42.60 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (1.99%)
PIBTL 16.94 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.77%)
PPL 223.00 Increased By ▲ 2.83 (1.29%)
PRL 51.75 Increased By ▲ 2.70 (5.5%)
PTC 70.80 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.13%)
SSGC 29.60 Increased By ▲ 0.46 (1.58%)
TBL 9.85 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.82%)
TELE 8.92 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.13%)
TPL 17.39 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.28%)
TPLP 12.80 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (2.32%)
TREET 22.98 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (1.73%)
TRG 60.69 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.78%)
By

LONDON: Prince Harry lost a court challenge against the UK government on Wednesday over a decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the country.

The youngest son of King Charles III launched legal action against the government after being told in February 2020 that he would no longer be given the “same degree” of publicly-funded protection when in Britain.

“The ‘bespoke’ process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound,” High Court judge Peter Lane said in his 52-page judgment. Harry sensationally left Britain in 2020 with his wife Meghan, eventually settling in California in the United States.

The prince told a hearing at London’s High Court in December that security concerns were preventing visits back to the United Kingdom.

“The UK is my home. The UK is central to the heritage of my children,” he told court in a written statement read out by his lawyers.

“That cannot happen if it’s not possible to keep them safe.

“I cannot put my wife in danger like that and, given my experiences in life, I am reluctant to unnecessarily put myself in harm’s way too,” he added.

The UK Home Office said it was “pleased” with the judgment and was “carefully considering” its next steps.

“The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate,” a spokesperson for the Home Office said. “It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.