BR100 Increased By (0.48%)
BR30 Increased By (0.45%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.28%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.19%)
BECO 6.06 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.5%)
BML 57.65 Increased By ▲ 4.90 (9.29%)
BOP 34.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.29%)
CNERGY 8.20 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
DCL 12.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.54%)
FCCL 54.08 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.35%)
FCSC 5.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.53%)
FFL 18.12 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.5%)
FNEL 1.32 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.54%)
HUMNL 11.21 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.91%)
KEL 8.15 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.49%)
KOSM 5.47 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.67%)
MLCF 88.82 Increased By ▲ 0.77 (0.87%)
NBP 186.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.06%)
PACE 10.75 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.28%)
PAEL 40.64 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.75%)
PIAHCLA 26.33 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.61%)
PIBTL 17.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 232.80 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.01%)
PRL 34.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.11%)
PTC 66.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.69 (-1.02%)
SEARL 91.55 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (0.68%)
SSGC 27.20 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.11%)
TELE 8.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.23%)
THCCL 64.86 Increased By ▲ 4.73 (7.87%)
TPLP 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.24 (2.74%)
TREET 24.77 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.94%)
TRG 73.00 Increased By ▲ 1.25 (1.74%)
WAVES 10.70 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (7.21%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

LAHORE: An Anti Terrorism Court on Saturday decided to hear the bail petitions of former Chairman PTI Imran Khan in seven ‘May 9 riots’ cases and others without his virtual attendance from jail.

The court adjourned the hearing till March 01 with a direction to the prosecution and the defence to come up with final arguments.

Earlier, the court resumed the hearing on the petitions; however, the superintendent of Adiala jail once again failed to ensure the attendance of Imran Khan through a WhatsApp video call or video link.

The court observed that the conduct of the jail’s superintendent amounted to contempt of court.

The court; however, noted that a decision on the bail petitions would be delayed if the court decided to start contempt proceedings against the superintendent.

The court asked the prosecution and the defence for their opinion on the matter of the petitioner’s online attendance.

The prosecutor did not oppose the decision of the court and said it would be better if the court heard the arguments without waiting for the petitioner’s attendance.

The counsel for Imran Khan also agreed and asked the court to decide the petitions without delay.

However, the prosecutor said he could present his arguments only in two cases as other cases had been assigned to another prosecutor.

The Khan’s counsel said the prosecution was trying to delay the decision on the petitions.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.