AIRLINK 74.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.07%)
BOP 5.11 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.19%)
CNERGY 4.43 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.23%)
DFML 37.69 Increased By ▲ 1.85 (5.16%)
DGKC 90.45 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (2.78%)
FCCL 22.60 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.8%)
FFBL 32.95 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.7%)
FFL 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
GGL 10.83 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.28%)
HBL 116.16 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.22%)
HUBC 135.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.25%)
HUMNL 9.88 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.41%)
KEL 4.61 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 4.80 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (3%)
MLCF 40.53 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (1.63%)
OGDC 138.21 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.22%)
PAEL 26.60 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.64%)
PIAA 26.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.84%)
PIBTL 6.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.89%)
PPL 123.55 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.53%)
PRL 26.94 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.94%)
PTC 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.71%)
SEARL 59.28 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (0.99%)
SNGP 70.87 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (0.67%)
SSGC 10.40 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
TELE 8.64 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.93%)
TPLP 11.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.79%)
TRG 64.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.42%)
UNITY 26.10 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.19%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 7,862 Increased By 23.8 (0.3%)
BR30 25,562 Increased By 102.2 (0.4%)
KSE100 75,169 Increased By 238.4 (0.32%)
KSE30 24,193 Increased By 47.4 (0.2%)

This is apropos a Business Recorder op-ed “Latest IMF projections” carried by the newspaper on Tuesday.

The writer, Dr Hafiz A Pasha, has analysed the Fund’s assessment in a meaningful way by saying, among other things, that “however, the outcome of the general election has opened up uncertainties about developments on the political front.

This could heighten risks also on the economic front and make it more difficult to achieve any improvement in the state of the economy.” The focal point of his conclusion, in my view, is the “political front” phrase.

No doubt, the Feb 8 general election has unfortunately given birth to a highly toxic situation owing to deeply polarized mandate besetting the country in which the task of achieving political stability seems to have become a formidable challenge for any political party or a coalition of political parties.

That is why perhaps the recent general election could be described as the most controversial one in the entire history of the country.

Having said that, I wish to make two points in relation to the approaches of two adversarial political forces to the IMF and its programme.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), which is vying to form its governments at Centre, in Punjab and KP, is not in favor of going back to the IMF; it has even hinted at the possibility of saying goodbye to the lender of last resort for ever.

Insofar as the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) and its partners such as Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) and Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) are concerned, it is increasingly clear that the incoming government’s approach to the Fund would not be different from Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) coalition government’s and its successor or current interim government’s.

The likely arrival of PDM coalition, which is aptly described as ‘PDM 2.0’, will surely augur well for the health of the ongoing Pakistan-IMF Standby Arrangement and the prospects for future Fund programmes for the country.

In other words, the Shehbaz Sharif-led coalition government will be expected to work harder to help lower risks on the economic front. However, it has to be seen how it will go about achieving political stability, which, without an iota of doubt, is a sine qua non of economic stability.

Rasheed Ahmad Chughtai (Karachi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2024

Comments

Comments are closed.