ISLAMABAD: Lahore High Court (LHC) has upheld the order of the Large Taxpayer Office (LTO) Lahore to withdraw the approval of non-profit organization (NPO) status granted to a renowned foundation.
According to an order issued by the LHC against the said foundation, the petitioner (foundation), challenged the withdrawal of approval extended to the petitioner as NPO, in exercise of powers under Rule 217 of the Income Tax Rules 2002 (Rules, 2002).
The tax department has cited various reasons for the withdrawal of the NPO status of the foundation, the primary being the key allegation that assets of the petitioner entity were employed in a manner to confer private benefit/personal gain to another person.
Action against LTO officers: IHC summons CCIR, Member Operations FBR for initiating proceedings
The NPO submitted that NPO status was withdrawn on erroneous assumptions, allegedly declaring that private benefit was bagged by an individual, but no specific instance was indicated, showing doling out of alleged benefit. No direct evidence of alleged benefit was established. The nature, objective and context of transaction under reference was misconstrued. The NPO was functioning in terms of section 42 of the erstwhile Companies Ordinance, 1984, as guarantee/non-profit company, enjoying privileges and abiding by the limitations prescribed in law, the petitioner added.
The LHC stated that the scope, context and reach of instant proceedings is to examine if any illegality was committed by tax department, while withdrawing approval under Rule 217 of the Rules, 2002, and while doing so to unravel the transaction for the purposes of ascertaining due compliance of requisite requirements for claiming NPO status.
“The NPO emphasized that transaction of loan was intended to pursue, well-defined, welfare purpose, that is establishment of Microfinance Bank and in achieving such an objective, if any incidental or ancillary benefit is, unintentionally extended to any person, it will not change the character of the petitioner, being a NPO entity”, LHC order said.
The foundation (NPO) claimed certain exemptions, privileges attached to and otherwise available to organizations, qualified for NPO status, without appreciating that the conditions, effect of limiting such exemptions and privileges to any NPO regime, require strict application and enforcement.
The NPO is unworthy and not entitled of availing such exemptions or privileges, in the wake of the transactions transacted, having the effect of conferring private benefit, attributable and realized, between two points in time.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2024
Comments
Comments are closed.