BR100 Increased By (0.71%)
BR30 Increased By (1.01%)
KSE100 Increased By (0.45%)
KSE30 Increased By (0.47%)
BECO 6.05 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (4.85%)
BML 53.25 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.47%)
BOP 34.35 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (1.06%)
CNERGY 8.19 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.99%)
DCL 12.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 53.66 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (1.57%)
FCSC 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.58%)
FFL 18.15 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.11%)
FNEL 1.30 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)
HUMNL 10.93 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.46%)
KEL 8.12 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.25%)
KOSM 5.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.72%)
MLCF 87.40 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.03%)
NBP 187.23 Increased By ▲ 2.07 (1.12%)
PACE 10.67 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.85%)
PAEL 39.90 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.22%)
PIAHCLA 26.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.31%)
PIBTL 17.50 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (4.98%)
PPL 229.58 Increased By ▲ 1.40 (0.61%)
PRL 34.80 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.35%)
PTC 67.07 Increased By ▲ 1.74 (2.66%)
SEARL 91.05 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.02%)
SSGC 27.08 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.8%)
TELE 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (3.86%)
THCCL 58.62 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.21%)
TPLP 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (4.38%)
TREET 24.65 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.49%)
TRG 70.35 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (0.92%)
WAVES 9.95 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.1%)
WTL 1.29 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.78%)

ISLAMABAD: The Registrar Supreme Court, on Monday, raised objections and returned former prime minister Imran Khan’s petition to protect his fundamental rights and set aside the trial court’s orders dismissing his pre-arrest bail petitions on technicalities.

PTI chief and former prime minister Imran Khan on August 17 had filed a petition through his counsels, Barrister Salman Safdar, Barrister Gohar Ali Khan, and four others under Article 184(3) of the constitution.

Special Judge Anti-Terrorism Court on 11-08-23 dismissed seven bail applications of Imran Khan due to his non-appearance before the Court, while the National Accountability Court, Islamabad, on 10-08-23 dismissed the pending pre-arrest bail application of Imran Khan in Al-Qadir Trust reference.

The SC Registrar’s Office raised objections that the petitioner has not pointed out as to what questions of public importance in the instant case are involved with reference to the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution, so as to directly invoke the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Article 184(3) of the constitution.

“The ingredient for invoking extraordinary jurisdiction of the apex court under Article 184(3) have not been satisfied,” noted the Registrar’s Office’s order.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.