BAFL 46.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.45%)
BIPL 21.04 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (3.34%)
BOP 5.54 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (4.33%)
CNERGY 4.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 18.82 Increased By ▲ 1.67 (9.74%)
DGKC 80.50 Increased By ▲ 1.65 (2.09%)
FABL 30.95 Increased By ▲ 1.71 (5.85%)
FCCL 20.49 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.69%)
FFL 9.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.72%)
GGL 13.94 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (9.33%)
HBL 116.96 Increased By ▲ 2.68 (2.35%)
HUBC 123.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.15%)
HUMNL 7.98 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (5.28%)
KEL 3.52 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (5.71%)
LOTCHEM 28.59 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.2%)
MLCF 42.10 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.24%)
OGDC 123.10 Increased By ▲ 8.99 (7.88%)
PAEL 18.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.16%)
PIBTL 5.71 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.96%)
PIOC 114.50 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (0.53%)
PPL 110.98 Increased By ▲ 11.52 (11.58%)
PRL 27.52 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (2.84%)
SILK 1.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.92%)
SNGP 70.09 Increased By ▲ 2.69 (3.99%)
SSGC 13.18 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (4.6%)
TELE 8.81 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.04%)
TPLP 13.65 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.63%)
TRG 91.94 Increased By ▲ 6.25 (7.29%)
UNITY 26.81 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (1.28%)
WTL 1.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.63%)
BR100 6,544 Increased By 101.5 (1.58%)
BR30 23,210 Increased By 429.3 (1.88%)
KSE100 63,918 Increased By 961.7 (1.53%)
KSE30 21,352 Increased By 348.1 (1.66%)

Today all three national parties - Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Peoples’ Party (PPP) and Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) – are fully supportive of projects under China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). The reason is as valid today as in 2015: a dearth of foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows, a desired form of foreign exchange inflows.

Pakistan has never been an attractive destination for foreign direct investment inflows though by anteing up the discount rate it has been the recipient of 4 to 5 billion US dollar portfolio investment that has unceremoniously left the country overnight at the slightest possibility of uncertainty, political or flawed economic policies, or at the prospect of better earnings elsewhere in the world.

On average FDI was 156.77 million dollars between 1997 to 2022 and registered 542.5 million dollars July-November 2021-22, plummeting even further to 397.2 million dollars in the comparable period of the current year.

In 2013 China’s One Belt One Road (OBOR) strategy sought to rekindle the Silk Road of centuries past, a centre piece of President Xi’s foreign policy initiative that also provided Chinese companies with purchase orders at a time when global recession was curtailing demand and, in some instances, provided jobs to Chinese workers. OBOR was a win-win for all participating countries by providing a unique opportunity to all those that signed off on the initiative (149 countries as of August 2022) to develop their inadequate physical infrastructure facilities.

China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a major component of OBOR, was all the more eagerly sought by the then PML-N administration with a plummeting rupee against all major currencies, a dearth of foreign exchange reserves (Saudis extended a grant of 1.5 billion dollars in early 2014), and a severe energy crisis resulting in load-shedding of several hours every day. In addition, CPEC was the only available FDI inflow at the time, an inflow that did not require to be repaid.

The two major national parties at the time hailed CPEC – the ruling PML-N and the PPP. The PTI expressed serious reservations on project selection at the time, a reservation that was unwisely expressed by Razzak Dawood in the last quarter of 2018 when he was the Commerce Minister in the Khan administration – a view that he as well as other senior leadership of the party backtracked from within months.

President Xi Jinping visited Pakistan from 20 to 21 April 2015 and signed off on 46 billion US dollar investment for 51 projects including construction of roads, rails and power plants, an amount that was upgraded to 65 billion dollars by 2022. The bulk of Chinese investment was for the power sector on a commercial basis, envisaging Chinese companies seeking loans from Chinese banks and insisting on the same contractual conditions as those enjoyed by existing Independent Power Producers (IPPs) criticized by many politicians as well as power sector experts for unfairly benefitting the IPPs on two major counts – capacity payments irrespective of how much electricity is actually bought and payment in dollars.

The Khan administration successfully renegotiated with IPPs set up under previous policies assisted by intelligence agencies however such an outcome has not been evident with projects set up under CPEC. It is critical for the coalition government to explore this possibility for as noted in the 2019 World Economic Forum report “executives ranked energy price shock as the highest risk for doing business in Pakistan.”

Counterpart funds and the 100 percent repatriation of profits and dividends allowed by Pakistan may account for the discrepancy in the CPEC inflows against actual FDI data released by the government of Pakistan. Board of Investment (BoI) data suggests that total FDI from 2015 till 2022 was 21.38 billion dollars (the bulk from China) though this amount does not include outflows. Finance Division data estimates inflows for the period to a little over 15 billion dollars – a far cry from investment of 65 billion dollars under CPEC.

As per Forbes by the end of 2020 those with high debt to China were all involved in OBOR with Pakistan’s external debt to China rising to 77.3 billion dollars, Angola 36.3 billion dollars, Sri Lanka 6.8 billion dollars. This high degree of debt to China has however not led to the actualization of predictions by Western doomsayers.

Former US Ambassador Alice Wells remarked on 21 November 2019 at the Wilson Center Washington DC that “CPEC is the Chinese communist party’s largest OBOR Initiative, reflecting over 60 billion dollars in regionally pledged commitment for projects in Pakistan;” and cited three major areas of concern: (i) “According to Pakistani government statistics, for each megawatt generated by a completed CPEC thermal energy project, developers spent an estimated 1.5 million.

In comparison, the cost per megawatt of building non-CPEC thermal plants is half of that, or 750 million;” (ii) “what are the burdens that have fallen on the new government to manage, now with an estimated $15 billion in debt to the Chinese government and another $6.7 billion in Chinese commercial debt? Because it’s clear, or it needs to be clear, that CPEC is not about aid. This is almost always the form of loans or other forms of financing, often non-concessional, with sovereign guarantees, or guaranteed profits for Chinese state-owned enterprises that are repatriated to China. Even if loan payments are deferred, they’re going to hang over Pakistan’s economic development potential, hamstringing Prime Minister Khan’s reform agenda;” and (iii) “lack of transparency can increase CPEC costs and foster corruption resulting in an even heavier debt burden for Pakistan.”

US Institute for Peace’s article dated 26 may 2021 by Uzair Younus notes: “China’s ability to exert influence on Pakistan’s economy has grown substantially in recent years, mainly due to the fact that Beijing is now Islamabad’s largest creditor. According to documents released by Pakistan’s finance ministry, Pakistan’s total public and publicly guaranteed external debt stood at $44.35 billion on 2013 just 9.3 percent of which was owed to China.

BY April 2021 this external debt had ballooned to 90.12 billion with Pakistan owing 27.4 percent – 24.7 billion dollars – of its total debt to China, according to the IMF. Nevertheless, China, to date, has refrained from directly influencing Pakistan’s economic policies.

In fact, as the ongoing IMF loan programme has indicated, the IMF, World Bank and ADB continue to be the key players when it comes to determining the fiscal policies that are adopted in Islamabad.” One may well add that the three multilaterals are also key players in determining all other economic policies including monetary policy, exchange policy, the role of the SBP in the economy and last but not least the need to focus subsidies on those who need it rather than as has been evident since October 2022 on the elite.

To conclude, it is the inexplicable adherence to its own flawed policies by successive Pakistani administrations (partly due to appointing the same individual as finance minister by multiple administrations who, in turn, supports the same flawed policies), and refusal to implement structural reforms while preferring to pass on sectoral inefficiencies on the hapless consumers that are responsible for the current appalling state of the economy and the simmering public discontent.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2023


Comments are closed.

Babar Malik Jan 16, 2023 02:14pm
CIA funded content
thumb_up Recommended (0)
TimeToMovveOn Jan 16, 2023 07:47pm
I have tracked CPEC for a long time. Keeping saying that CPEC is a game changer will not make it a game changer. Gwadar, where billions have been poured, has not seen any uptick in economic activity which is there are protests. Why? Because Pakistan used Chinese loans and interest to buy Chinese equipment, get Chinese people, and then pay the Chinese the same money Pakistan borrowed from China. How does this benefit Pakistan when the money never circulates into the economy? Also, for all these mega projects like A380 capable Gwadar airport, there has to be enough local economic activity. Here Pakistan is hoping that industries from China will relocate to Gwadar and use the expensive mega facilities that China has built. This assumption is false and shows Pakistan's thinking of always relying on others to help with everything. Chinese industries have moved to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Bangladesh, where there is better economic and political stability. In the end, Pakistan will just be left holding the loan bags. Phase 1 of CPEC was good. But Phase 2 and Phase 3 are going to go nowhere.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mushtaq Rajpar Jan 16, 2023 09:34pm
I do not think this quote from Forbes is correct "As per Forbes by the end of 2020 those with high debt to China were all involved in OBOR with Pakistan’s external debt to China rising to 77.3 billion dollars". Chinese debt to Pakistan is not more than $30 billion. State Bank will never share the data. Mushtaq Rajpar Washington DC
thumb_up Recommended (0)
. Jan 19, 2023 03:01pm
@TimeToMovveOn, well said time to wake up. we cant dream forever .we need to look at the whole picture not bit from here and there .we need to rethink the whole schems for us not them.
thumb_up Recommended (0)

CPEC: a game changer or ...?

Another day, another high: KSE-100 gains 1.5% to close near 64,000

Imran free to contest upcoming elections: caretaker PM Kakar

ADB approves $659mn project financing to support Pakistan

At least three dead in fire incident at Karachi’s Ayesha Manzil: mayor

Inter-bank: rupee registers 7th consecutive gain against US dollar

Open market: rupee’s strengthening round continues against US dollar

Security forces kill terrorist in KP’s DI Khan: ISPR

Experts see status quo in last monetary policy announcement of 2023

485 foreign players register for PSL 2024 draft

Despite Gaza death toll soaring, US unlikely to rethink weapons supplies to Israel