AIRLINK 62.48 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (3.39%)
BOP 5.36 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
CNERGY 4.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.43%)
DFML 15.50 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (4.45%)
DGKC 66.40 Increased By ▲ 1.60 (2.47%)
FCCL 17.59 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (4.33%)
FFBL 27.70 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (11.92%)
FFL 9.27 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.32%)
GGL 10.06 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1%)
HBL 105.70 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (1.43%)
HUBC 122.30 Increased By ▲ 4.78 (4.07%)
HUMNL 6.60 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.92%)
KEL 4.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.1%)
KOSM 4.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.97%)
MLCF 36.20 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (2.23%)
OGDC 122.92 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (0.43%)
PAEL 23.00 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (4.97%)
PIAA 29.34 Increased By ▲ 2.05 (7.51%)
PIBTL 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-2.36%)
PPL 107.50 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.12%)
PRL 27.25 Increased By ▲ 0.74 (2.79%)
PTC 18.07 Increased By ▲ 1.97 (12.24%)
SEARL 53.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-1.17%)
SNGP 63.21 Increased By ▲ 2.01 (3.28%)
SSGC 10.80 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.47%)
TELE 9.20 Increased By ▲ 0.71 (8.36%)
TPLP 11.44 Increased By ▲ 0.86 (8.13%)
TRG 70.86 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (1.36%)
UNITY 23.62 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.47%)
WTL 1.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 6,944 Increased By 65.8 (0.96%)
BR30 22,827 Increased By 258.6 (1.15%)
KSE100 67,142 Increased By 594.3 (0.89%)
KSE30 22,090 Increased By 175.1 (0.8%)

ISLAMABAD: The Lahore High Court (LHC) issued notice to the Secretary Finance, and chairman Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) to file the report and para-wise comments before December 12, 2022.

A single bench of Abid Hussain Chattha also issued notice to the Attorney General for Pakistan under Order XXVII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and suspended the impugned condition in notification/ SRO No 986 (1)/2019 dated 02-09-2019 till further orders.

The court said the dispensation sought for is allowed, subject to all just and legal expectations.

The petitioners have assailed the vires of a condition contained in notification/ SRO No 986(1)/2019 dated 02-09-2019, whereby, the exemptions granted vide SRO24 (1)/2019 dated 16-01-2012 with respect to the requirements of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to all power sectors companies, were curtailed to apply to only such companies that have executed Power Purchase Agreement before January 1, 2019.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that imposition of this condition retrospectively takes away vested rights accrued to the petitioners through their respective Letter of Intent (LoI), Letter of Support (LoS), and Letter of Power Tariff Determination by the NEPRA. He added that the impugned condition is also discriminatory since similarly placed power companies are being subjected to different accounting standards which is also discriminatory since similarly placed power companies are being subjected to different accounting standards which is unconstitutional in term of Article 25 of the Constitution.

Master Green Energy Limited and 11 other power producing companies have filed the petitions under Article 199 of the Constitution and cited Secretary Finance Ministry, and Chairman SECP as respondents.

The petitioners have entered into Power Purchase Agreements with Central Power Purchasing Agency (Guarantee) Limited for the sale of electricity; the electricity is priced in American dollars but is payable in equivalent Pakistani rupees.

However, in an arbitrary, whimsical and illegal exercise of power, the SECP has suddenly imposed illogical accounting standards, by which the power companies are now required to calculate the average value of the exchange rate between the Pakistan rupee and the USD over the lifetime of their respective agreement (which is approximately 25 years). Moreover, they are then to calculate the revenue they would get in terms of this estimated average exchange rate. Thereafter, they have to see how much more revenue they would get in comparison to the revenue they would receive based on the exchange rate on the day on which the Power Purchase Agreement was signed.

They stated that bizarrely, they are supposed to show this entire differential (at net present value) as income for the first year. What is critical to note is that this is now categorised as “Other Income”, which resultantly, would now not be exempt from income tax. Thus, the petitioners face a situation where if their actual profits are maybe Rs100 they are now forced to declare (on paper only), let us say, the notional figure of Rs5,000 as their profits.

As a result, instead of paying no tax on the Rs100 (pursuant to the tax exemption granted by the Income Tax Ordinance) under the newly-imposed accounting standard they are now liable to pay tax on the notional figure of Rs5,000, which they may (or may not) receive over the lifetime of the agreements of 25 years.

The contended following such an accounting standard would force the petitioners to shut down; therefore, the chairman SECP, on the instruction of the federal government, realising the urgent need for power production, exempted all companies from applying such standards (through notification (SRO24(I)/2012) dated 16-01-2012.

Consequently, as per the normal accounting norms, every year the petitioners’ companies will declare their actually received revenue based on the number of units they will sell and this would then be used to calculate their respective profit of the year.

The petitioners have prayed before the LHC to declare that the 2019 notification does not apply to the petitioners as vested rights have accrued in their favour and direct the SECP chairman to treat them at par with those companies to whom the exemption continues to be available, or in the alternative, declare the 2019 notification be discriminatory, illegal, unlawful and ultra vires of the Constitution, and set it aside.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.

samir sardana Nov 27, 2022 05:16pm
MASTER GREEN ENERGY, IS A RE ENTITY. PPA TARRIFF HAS TO BE ,THUS, BASED ON USD & GAS/RFO/LDO/HSD SAVED. BUT THE RE IPP, WILL .HAVE USD LOANS ALSO. SO BY ASKING THE IPP TO COMPUTE TARRIFF BASED ON USD/PKR RATE ON DATE OF PPAA - THE GOP THINKING IS THAT RE IPP SHOULD SWAP THE USD LOAN AND IF THE LOAN IS SWAPPED, THE IF USD SHOOTS UP & PKR CRASHES - RE IPP SHOULD NOT MAKE WINDFALL UNDUE UNDESERVED GAINS FROM THE SAME THAT IS Y GOP IS ASKING FOR THE 25 YEARS AVERAGE USD RATES - AS THAT POSSIBLE SUPERPROFIT IS "NOT" TO A BET ON RE - BUT A PUNT ON USD AND PAKISTAN ECONOMY - WHICH IS NOT THE PURPOSE OF RE POWER. HOWEVER, TAXING THAT AS OTHER INCOME, IN THE 1ST YEAR, IS DUBIOUS, AS IT IS NOTIONAL INCOME. IF TAXED,THEN LATER, IF IT DOES NOT REALISE, IT WILL NEED TO BE REFUNDED - WHICH IS A SENSELESS ACCOUNTING AND TAX COMPLICATION. AT THE SAME TIME, A RE IPP CANNOT BE FORCED,TO SWAP ITS USD LOAN.SOME ONE CAN THEN ASK FOR SWAPPING, THE USD EQUITY & DIVIDEND ON USD EQUITY.dindooohindoo
thumb_up Recommended (0)
SAMIR SARDANA Nov 27, 2022 08:23pm
SOLUTION - PART 1 THE FUEL COST = VARIABLE COMPONENT OF THE IPP PPA TARRIFF WHICH IS PAID MONTHLY, CAN BE PAID ON THE PKR MONTHLY AVERAGE OR THE PKR RATE NOTIFIED, BY PAKISTAN CUSTOMS, FOR IMPORTS - WHICHEVER, IS LOWER ! NOW THE EQUIPMENT COST RECOVERY WHICH IS BASED ON A 25 YEAR LIFE AND THE EXPECTED POWER GENERATION OVER THAT PERIOD. THIS COST WAS FROZEN AT THE TIME OF IPP AND WILL HAVE SOME IMPORT COMPONENT AND A USD LOAN. THE LOAN WILL BE SAY, 80% OF COST AND TENOR OF, 3 + 5 OR 3+7 YEARS (3 YEAR MORATORIUM). BOTH THE VARIABLE AND FIXED COST RECOVERY,ARE A PART OF THE PPA TARRIFF. PPA TARRIFF IS PAID MONTHLY,WHILE LOAN PAYMENT IS QUARTERLY, OR 6 MONTHLY. SO HERE,THERE WILL BE A TIMING MISMATCH, OF THE ACTUAL PKR PAID OUT, TO BANK,AND THE PKR USED, FOR PPA POWER PAYMENT. IN ADDITION THE LOAN PRNCIPAL EPAID WILL BE MUCH MORE THAN THE CAPACITY CHARGE RECOVERED IN THE PPA TARRIFF FOR A QUARTER (AS PPA IS FOR 25 YEARS). L
thumb_up Recommended (0)
SAMIR SARDANA Nov 27, 2022 08:36pm
SOLUTION - PART 2 LET US SAY THAT THE ENTIRE IPP LOAN IS PAID OFF IN YEAR 9 - BUT THE TARRIFF OF 25 YEARS, IS BASED ON LEVELISED COSTS. NOW,SAY PKR CRASHES - BUT THE LOAN WAS REPAID IN YEAR 9 -SO THE IPP WILL GET WINDFALL GAINS IN THE PPA TARRIFF ALTHOUGH LOAN IS REPAID THAT CANNOT BE ALLOWED ! SO THE USD LOAN CAN BE SWAPPED FOR 9 YEARS,AND THAT PKR RATE CAN BE COSTED INTO THE PPA TARRIFF ,ON A LEVELISED BASIS.AFTER THE 9 YEAR PERIOD, THE PKR TARRIFF WILL VARY ONLY, FOR THE VARIABLE COST COMPONENT (ID.EST. THE DEEMED COST REPLACED -GAS/RFO/LDO/HSD) SAVED. AFTER 9 YEARS, THE REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE COSTS,WILL ALSO RISE UP AS A % TO SALES. THAT WILL BE FAIRLY COMPENSATED BY THE PKR USED,FOR THE DEEMED VARIABLE COST TARRIFF - AS THE SPARES ETC., ARE IMPORTED. THIS ALSO BRINGS CERTAINTY TO THE PLANING OF THE GRID,AS THE FIXED COST RECOVERY IS FROZEN - IN TERMS OF THE LOAN SWAP RATE IN TERMS OF PKR USED TO CONVERT USD TARRIFF THAT IS TRANSPARENT, FAIR AND AUDITABLE.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
SAMIR SARDANA Nov 27, 2022 08:39pm
SOLUTION - 3 AS FAR AS USD NEEDED TO REPLACE THE RE PLANT AFTER 5 YEARS -- AFTER 25 YEARS, THERE WILL BE A COMPLETE TECH CHANGE,AND YOU MIGHT NEED REMIMBI OR THE TECH MIGHT BE MADE IN PAKISTAN! IN 25 YEARS USD MIGHT APPRECIATE 1 OR IN 25 YEARS,THE RE EFFICIENCY RATEM IN TERMS OF USD VALUE OF GAS/COAL/OIL SAVED, TO USD VALUE OF RE EQUIPMENT - MIGHT BE 3-5 TIMES, CURRENT LEVELS. SO THE RE IPP WILL HAVE A BONANZA, AT THE END OF 25 YEARS,IN TERMS OF USD VALUE, OF CAPITAL REPLACEMENT VALUE - WHICH IS NOT CAPTURED IN THE PPA ! SHOULD THAT ALSO BE CAPTURED IN THE PPA ?
thumb_up Recommended (0)