BAFL 44.70 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (4.54%)
BIPL 20.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.48%)
BOP 5.22 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.57%)
CNERGY 4.42 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.38%)
DFML 15.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 70.21 Increased By ▲ 1.57 (2.29%)
FABL 27.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.32%)
FCCL 17.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.12%)
FFL 8.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.14%)
GGL 13.11 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.08%)
HBL 113.45 Increased By ▲ 4.42 (4.05%)
HUBC 121.61 Increased By ▲ 4.37 (3.73%)
HUMNL 7.89 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.51%)
KEL 3.36 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.2%)
LOTCHEM 27.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.85%)
MLCF 39.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-0.28%)
OGDC 108.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 18.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 5.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.72%)
PIOC 109.31 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.38%)
PPL 92.15 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.71%)
PRL 25.08 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.32%)
SILK 1.05 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.96%)
SNGP 63.56 Increased By ▲ 1.86 (3.01%)
SSGC 12.27 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.66%)
TELE 8.88 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.14%)
TPLP 13.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.07%)
TRG 85.50 Increased By ▲ 1.09 (1.29%)
UNITY 26.10 Increased By ▲ 0.85 (3.37%)
WTL 1.59 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (4.61%)
BR100 6,242 Increased By 133.2 (2.18%)
BR30 21,739 Increased By 476.6 (2.24%)
KSE100 60,730 Increased By 918.9 (1.54%)
KSE30 20,240 Increased By 379.1 (1.91%)

ISLAMABAD: The Lahore High Court (LHC) has declared that the orders of the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) can only be challenged before the President of Pakistan.

The LHC has dismissed writ petition against orders of the FTO while deciding the matter of the FTO’s jurisdiction in writ petition No 20123-22 and other two associated petitions.

The LHC has held that the FTO’s orders can only be challenged before the President.

As per details, the LHC’s order stated that complaints filed before the FTO, under section 10(1), regarding delay in refund, were adjudicated, after receiving para wise comments and hearing both sides that the refund application of petitioner, in terms of section 170(4) of Income Tax Ordinance 2001, had already been disposed of vide Bar code order 27.10.2020 and a legal remedy of appeal was available under section 127 of the Ordinance, which complainant did not avail.

Maladministration in FBR: FTO has authority to conduct inspection

Review filed with the FTO by petitioner was also dismissed on the above mentioned ground.

The LHC further held that “Review Orders” of the FTO, declining to revisit his earlier orders, appears to be reasonable, which, prima facie, does not require any interference.

The court further held that the FTO’s order could only be challenged in representation with the president and this statutory remedy was never availed by the petitioner.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.