BR100 Decreased By (-0.15%)
BR30 Decreased By (-0.74%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.41%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.67%)
BECO 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-3.81%)
BML 58.03 Increased By ▲ 5.28 (10.01%)
BOP 33.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.40 (-1.17%)
CNERGY 8.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
DCL 11.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-4.62%)
FCCL 53.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-1%)
FCSC 5.40 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.45%)
FFL 17.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.78%)
FNEL 1.31 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.77%)
HUMNL 11.06 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.55%)
KEL 8.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.74%)
KOSM 5.45 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.3%)
MLCF 87.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.86 (-0.98%)
NBP 184.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-1.01%)
PACE 11.62 Increased By ▲ 0.90 (8.4%)
PAEL 40.31 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (0.93%)
PIAHCLA 26.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 17.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.33%)
PPL 228.40 Decreased By ▼ -4.38 (-1.88%)
PRL 34.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-1.03%)
PTC 67.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.31%)
SEARL 91.00 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.08%)
SSGC 26.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.99%)
TELE 8.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.47%)
THCCL 66.14 Increased By ▲ 6.01 (10%)
TPLP 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.05%)
TREET 24.59 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.2%)
TRG 71.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.08%)
WAVES 10.98 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (10.02%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)

ISLAMABAD: Federal Tax Ombudsman has noted with concern that the Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) field formations are not maintaining IT-based tracking system to follow up big tax evasion cases unearthed in field offices.

The FTO Monday recommended the FBR to devise an institutionalised internal follow up system for significant cases involving recovery of unpaid amount of taxes.

An in-House analysis by the office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman has identified that nor its any single FBR field formation maintains any IT-based tracking system, any exhaustive, fool proof and IT module or any institutionalized internal follow up system for the cases unearthed by its own formations. However, the FBR and its dozens of field formations, maintain an organized web portal and full-fledged home grown IT support system i.e. Pakistan Automation (PVT) LTD (PRAL).

The FTOs analysis has unearthed a number of potential cases of tax evasion. The FTO office took up one major case of M/s. Hope 87 Pakistan, a detailed Investigation Report and case study was prepared after the case examination. It was confirmed that in this case shared by Directorate General (DG), BTB FBR.

This valuable information was duly shared in December, 2018 with the concerned field formations for taking action against said entities for not declaring true particulars of their receipts/income and not discharging their responsibilities as withholding agents. However in 2019, FBR management suddenly shelved this whole BTB regime overnight; disbanding BTB Zones Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi.

Office of DG BTB was relegated to a ceremonial entity assigned as additional charge. Thus in addition to losing an effective organization, the repository of the whole above data/information was suddenly rendered extinct.

FTO’s investigation clearly established that information passed by DG BTB in December, 2018 had neither been utilized before the intervention made by the office nor analyzed vis-a-vis ground position of the entity in question.

None of the field officers of FBR holding jurisdiction over the instant case during December, 2018 and November, 2021 was vigilant enough to initiate the action which has been initiated after 03 years and that too after the intervention of FTO Secretariat.

Federal Tax Ombudsman has now held that, negligence and inefficiency on the part of FBR officials in enforcing various provisions of law in major revenue potential cases is tantamount to maladministration.

Federal Tax Ombudsman directed FBR to direct the Chief Commissioner IR, CTO, Islamabad to ensure that action initiated in the instant case, after three years’ delay may be expedited and finalized on priority basis.

FTO has also observed that FBR lacks an IT based tracking system archiving for such cases and recommended for devising an institutionalised internal follow up system for significant cases involving recovery and follow up on implementation of rules.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.