AIRLINK 80.00 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.05%)
BOP 5.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.94%)
CNERGY 4.35 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.46%)
DFML 33.19 Increased By ▲ 2.32 (7.52%)
DGKC 78.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.65%)
FCCL 20.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.78%)
FFBL 32.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.46%)
FFL 10.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
GGL 10.35 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.58%)
HBL 117.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-0.51%)
HUBC 135.15 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.04%)
HUMNL 6.90 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.44%)
KEL 4.55 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (9.11%)
KOSM 4.79 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.27%)
MLCF 37.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.77 (-1.99%)
OGDC 133.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.00 (-0.74%)
PAEL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.81%)
PIAA 26.86 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.83%)
PIBTL 7.04 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.28%)
PPL 113.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.23%)
PRL 27.85 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.43%)
PTC 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.3%)
SEARL 57.89 Increased By ▲ 1.39 (2.46%)
SNGP 67.40 Increased By ▲ 1.10 (1.66%)
SSGC 11.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.73%)
TELE 9.22 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.77%)
TPLP 11.69 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.17%)
TRG 73.25 Increased By ▲ 1.82 (2.55%)
UNITY 24.95 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (1.8%)
WTL 1.40 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (5.26%)
BR100 7,516 Increased By 23 (0.31%)
BR30 24,667 Increased By 109.3 (0.44%)
KSE100 72,226 Increased By 173.9 (0.24%)
KSE30 23,800 Decreased By -7.3 (-0.03%)

Instead, we have huge gas-based expensive thermal power plants WITH NO CHECK ON EFFICIENCY. Even theoretical “efficient” combined cycle power plants are operated inefficiently for most of the time, and the authorities accept inefficient operation with no concern, and thus add high fuel costs to the tariff, without any hesitation as “pass-through” costs, CERTAINLY WORST POSSIBLE POLICY!

Technologies are available to ensure that these inefficiently-operated combined cycle power plants are operated at high efficiency under different ambient conditions but they are encouraged to be inefficient so that high fuel costs actually add to overall profits of commercial power plants! We need to record and publicise the actual efficiency of our thermal power plants (average monthly heat rates) so that we know how poorly our thermal power plants are being operated!

We have not really encouraged cost-effective solar energy source which should have seen some major investment in solar thermal power plants in our sun-belt areas, at base power production costs of less than equivalent to 4 US cents per kWh unit. How is it that we are allowing new gas-based power plants to be operated inefficiently when cost, and availability, of natural gas would be subject to world-wide inflation? If we could ensure more power at overall less gas consumption per kWh unit from the present power plants, why should we allow new expensive and inefficient power plants to be installed in the country, causing both high foreign exchange loss in capital investment and continued high foreign exchange loss in imported gas consumption?

Renewable energy projects — I

In addition to economically attractive CSP-based solar power, we need to urgently take action to ensure high-efficiency operation of our existing combined cycle power plants and set up CSP solar thermal power plants to avoid operation of inefficient and highly polluting power plants as being presently done!

(Concluded)

Engr. Ainul Abedin (Karachi)

Copyright Business Recorder, 2022

Comments

Comments are closed.