BR100 Decreased By (-0.08%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.11%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.2%)
AGHA 7.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.31%)
BECO 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-8.26%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.41%)
BOP 34.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.52%)
CNERGY 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
CSIL 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.72%)
FCCL 57.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.88%)
FFL 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.66%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.94%)
KOSM 5.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
MLCF 101.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.8%)
NBP 203.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.86%)
NCPL 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.41%)
NPL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (1.81%)
OGDC 318.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.14%)
PACE 11.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 42.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIBTL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
PPL 230.62 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.51%)
PRL 76.73 Increased By ▲ 5.93 (8.38%)
PTC 71.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.25%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.13%)
TBL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.3%)
TPLP 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.97%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.81%)
TRG 60.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.33%)

The leaders of BRICS countries gather on Thursday for their fourth summit, with the emerging market bloc struggling to convert its growing economic strength into collective diplomatic clout. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa represent 40 percent of humanity, but their grouping faces persistent questions over whether it can unite on key issues given the different priorities of its members.
While trade between them is booming, it still represents a small fraction of world commerce and the bloc struggles to come together on global economic issues such as ongoing world trade talks or the leadership of the IMF and World Bank. "The BRICS concept represents, above all, its members' desire to make the global order more plural," wrote Brahma Chellaney from the Center for Policy Research in New Delhi, where the summit will take place.
"But it is uncertain whether the group's members will ever evolve into a coherent grouping with defined goals and institutional mechanisms," he wrote in a recent column. The problem, say doubters, is the plurality of the BRICS group itself which is riven by rivalries. It brings together authoritarian Russia and China with three democracies, while each of their economies is different.
The leadership changes at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank appeared to represent obvious opportunities for the BRICS to throw their weight behind a joint candidate. Opening up global financial and economic institutions remains a cornerstone of the group's agenda, but they have opted not to collectively challenge European or American dominance of the Washington-based lenders.
France's Christine Lagarde was given a clear run to become head of the IMF last year, and there will be no common candidate for the post of World Bank president which will be decided by April this year. "I have not heard anything so far (about a common candidate)," Sudhir Vyas, a senior official at Indian foreign ministry, told a media briefing about the summit on Monday.
The US candidate Jim Yong Kim, currently president of Dartmouth College, faces a challenge from Colombian university professor Jose Antonio Ocampo and Nigerian finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. The BRICS group, which held its first summit in 2009, was initially Brazil, Russia, India and China, but was enlarged last year to include South Africa, which is dwarfed by the others but is seen as the representative of Africa.
Much attention in the lead-up to the summit in New Delhi focused on the creation of the first BRICS institutions which would help cement the five countries together. A common secretariat remains a far-fetched idea, but leaders are expected to again discuss a much-touted investment bank, known as the "South-South Bank" or "BRICS Bank" which would fund infrastructure and development.

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2012

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.