AGHA 7.69 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BECO 5.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.19%)
BML 62.15 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.5%)
BOP 36.10 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.28%)
CNERGY 11.46 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.87%)
CSIL 6.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.16%)
FCCL 56.61 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.47%)
FFL 16.65 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.85%)
FNEL 1.20 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 7.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.67%)
KOSM 6.10 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.37%)
MLCF 102.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-0.89%)
NBP 207.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.09%)
NCPL 63.23 Increased By ▲ 1.31 (2.12%)
NPL 73.00 Increased By ▲ 0.82 (1.14%)
OGDC 318.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.08%)
PACE 11.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.09%)
PAEL 44.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.07%)
PIBTL 16.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.18%)
PPL 221.25 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-0.55%)
PRL 64.70 Increased By ▲ 0.89 (1.39%)
PTC 74.00 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.15%)
SSGC 27.30 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.18%)
TBL 9.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.3%)
TELE 8.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.45%)
TPL 20.37 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.15%)
TPLP 14.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.07%)
TREET 24.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.41%)
TRG 62.37 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)

A division bench of the Lahore High Court here on Tuesday issued notice to Chenab Rangers' wing commander Colonel Nadeem Ahmad Karim in a contempt of court petition and directed him to file his reply by July 27. The petitioner Muhammad Asif of Narowal contended that the respondent officer defied an earlier court order and did not allow him to harvest wheat crop on his land measuring 1,844 Kanals and seven Marlas.
The petitioner submitted that the LHC division bench on May 02 last had directed the border area committee to allow the petitioner to harvest wheat crop on the land, but the respondent officer summoned the petitioner in his office and pressurised him to surrender the possession of the land.
The counsel said petitioner approached the border area committee with an application for grant of status quo regarding the possession of the land and for the preservation of wheat and other crops sown by the petitioner. But, he said, the committee had not taken any action in this regard.
Counsel pointed out that the LHC had directed the authorities not to disturb the possession of the petitioner over the said land in another petition filed in 2008 The petitioner, therefore, prayed the court to proceed against the respondents under contempt of court act for defying court orders.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.