BR100 Decreased By (-0.08%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.11%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.2%)
AGHA 7.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.31%)
BECO 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-8.26%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.41%)
BOP 34.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.52%)
CNERGY 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
CSIL 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.72%)
FCCL 57.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.88%)
FFL 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.66%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.94%)
KOSM 5.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
MLCF 101.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.8%)
NBP 203.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.86%)
NCPL 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.41%)
NPL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (1.81%)
OGDC 318.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.14%)
PACE 11.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 42.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIBTL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
PPL 230.62 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.51%)
PRL 76.73 Increased By ▲ 5.93 (8.38%)
PTC 71.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.25%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.13%)
TBL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.3%)
TPLP 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.97%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.81%)
TRG 60.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.33%)

The Supreme Court Wednesday rejected a plea moved by former 'chief justice of Pakistan' Abdul Hamid Dogar, objecting to the current proceedings against judges for taking oath under the Provisional Constitution Order (PCO) in violation of the verdict rendered by a seven-member bench of the apex court on November 3, 2007.
A four-member bench comprising Justice Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui, Justice Jawwad S Khawaja, Justice Khilji Arif Hussain and Justice Tariq Pervez in its short order verbally dismissed the plea moved by Abdul Hameed Dogar. The civil miscellaneous application was moved by former chief justice of Pakistan Abdul Hamid Dogar through his counsel Raja Ibrahim Satti, under Article 10 (A) related to holding of fair trial read with Rules 6 of the Supreme Court Rules 1980.
The counsel had contended that his client was caught by surprise when it came to his knowledge that on direction of this bench a criminal original no: 2 of 2011 was filed against him regarding contempt of court issue in which the bench become a complainant and interested party.
He said by doing so the bench members were legally disqualified to further proceed on the instant matter. He said all members of the bench were also violators of the alleged order of November 3, 2007 and therefore, one set of violators could not hear the case against similar persons. "The unholy haste and anxiety shown by the bench further disqualified the bench to proceed with the matter as done in the Chief Justice of Pakistan case," he added.
The counsel said his client was of the opinion that under current circumstances, he would not get a fair trial as guaranteed under Article 10(A) of the constitution. He prayed to bench to recuse themselves from further proceedings in the larger interest of justice.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.