BR100 Decreased By (-0.08%)
BR30 Increased By (0.08%)
KSE100 Decreased By (-0.11%)
KSE30 Decreased By (-0.2%)
AGHA 7.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.31%)
BECO 5.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-8.26%)
BML 58.30 Decreased By ▼ -1.44 (-2.41%)
BOP 34.58 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.52%)
CNERGY 13.68 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (4.35%)
CSIL 6.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.72%)
FCCL 57.55 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-0.88%)
FFL 16.50 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (1.66%)
FNEL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
KEL 7.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.94%)
KOSM 5.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.83%)
LOTCHEM 27.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-0.58%)
MLCF 101.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.82 (-0.8%)
NBP 203.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-0.86%)
NCPL 60.47 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (1.41%)
NPL 69.80 Increased By ▲ 1.24 (1.81%)
OGDC 318.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.14%)
PACE 11.12 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.63%)
PAEL 42.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-0.56%)
PIBTL 16.72 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.54%)
PPL 230.62 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (0.51%)
PRL 76.73 Increased By ▲ 5.93 (8.38%)
PTC 71.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.25%)
SSGC 27.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.13%)
TBL 10.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
TELE 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.35%)
TPL 23.59 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (2.3%)
TPLP 15.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.97%)
TREET 24.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.81%)
TRG 60.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.33%)

An appellate bench of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) comprising Chairperson, Ms Rahat Kaunain Hassan and Member (M&A), Ms Vaddiya Khalil, held a hearing in respect of the proceedings initiated against Wateen Telecom and Defence Housing Authority (DHA).
According to a press release issued on Friday, upon request and being urged by Wateen's counsel, the bench granted 10 days for submission of reply to the CCP show cause notice and for furnishing documents required by the bench. The CCP had issued show cause notices to Wateen and DHA on 26 November 2010 for violating Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010 by entering into an exclusive agreement for provision of telecommunication and media services for one of the phases of DHA.
It was pointed out during the hearing Wateen failed to submit documents that it was required by the bench in the previous hearing. On behalf of Wateen, legal concerns were raised regarding the jurisdiction of CCP and the retrospective effect of the competition law. Wateen's rationale for agreeing to an exclusive arrangement for a period of 30 years is the huge investment made by Wateen in respect of the project.
On the other hand, DHA in its submissions highlighted that Wateen has not been performing its obligations under the exclusive agreement and that DHA has been receiving complaints from its residents about the inefficiency of Wateen and would be keen that this exclusivity be withdrawn and is willing to amend the agreement.-PR

Copyright Business Recorder, 2011

Comments

Comments are closed for this article.